Oh.
I thought that the whole point of this post was about the ecological damage caused by illegal immigration and how it was despoiling your state.
Now you don't care, apparently.
Is there any consistency to your positions?
Printable View
Oh.
I thought that the whole point of this post was about the ecological damage caused by illegal immigration and how it was despoiling your state.
Now you don't care, apparently.
Is there any consistency to your positions?
9's FAIL.
You're still not getting it.Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker
You may have noticed that in earlier posts I am in favor of building dams and power plants, but liberals object to these things and hide behind environmentalism as an excuse, but yet when the desert wilderness gets defiled by illegal immigration they conveniently ignore it because they don't want to call any attention to any of the negative impacts of illegal immigration.
So you're saying that "liberals" that advocate clean air, water, stricter waste disposal regulations and for environmentally friendlier packaging etc. are being hypocrites because they haven't highlighted a particular source of pollution in a particular area? Is this particular area somehow not included in "protect the environment" meme and needs separate attention? If a national advocacy group fails to mention a single local issue does that mean they don't care about trash?Quote:
Originally Posted by 999969999
MLK didn't speak out about every single case of racial injustice on an individual basis.
Clocker can speak for himself, but I get it. You're pushing a conspiracy theory.
If environmentalism is but an "excuse" that liberals are hiding behind, what, prithee tell, is the "real" reason they object?Quote:
Originally Posted by 999969999