Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
The formula I use on the board is
Forum>BT>BT Trades --> Mark forum read
Forum>BT>BT Giveaways --> Mark forum read
New posts (aka What's New) --> Enjoy.
I wish I had a default setting that could permanently mark those 2 as read. I looked for it without success awhile ago. Maybe a feature request if it's possible?
http://filesharingtalk.com/search.ph...exclude=158,90 :happy:
Edit: sorry, didn't see P2PDog's post before making mine. I've been using the "exclude" parameter almost since I registered here, to cut down the new posts list from 12 pages to 2 after blocking word game and NZB (back in vB3) threads.
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Thanks guys, since I don't know much about vb, I didn't know about exclude. Some new numbers to get intimate with (90, 146, 158)
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megabyteme
IN OTHER NEWS... Idol is within 5 posts of 15k. :o
I bet a dollar that that post contains cloaked blatant references to homosexuality.
As far as I can see the only benefit of 15K posts is presenting anyone arguing with me the easy "You have 15K posts on a website.Get a life loser" comeback .
For the "exclusion" option and as much as certain sections are consistently irritating and of no real value to me , I'd rather deal with annoyance than deal in exclusion.
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
For the "exclusion" option and as much as certain sections are consistently irritating and of no real value to me , I'd rather deal with annoyance than deal in exclusion.
You make URL codes sound elitist, care to comment on fmt=18 and fmt=22?
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
care to comment on fmt=18 and fmt=22?
Are those HDBits' new names?
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Before Youtube had selectable "resolutions", these codes would give you the high quality videos if you added them into the URL. I don't know if it still works
Edit: Not to ruin the reference by explanation, but I picked those due to IdolEyes' complete adoration of HD snobbery
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
For the "exclusion" option and as much as certain sections are consistently irritating and of no real value to me , I'd rather deal with annoyance than deal in exclusion.
You make URL codes sound elitist, care to comment on fmt=18 and fmt=22?
Not to waste a post but all this internet stuff is over my head .
I do know that Jon Bon Jovi was in U-571 which managed the previously thought impossible and got me to sympathize with the Nazis and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley is FHM's sexiest women of 2011 ( obvious sham ) if that is somehow connected to what you said in any way.:unsure:
If not then I suggest you go listen to Slippery When Wet before getting back to me.
Btw my " problem" with people lauding the glories of HD here as pertains to most new movies and TV series is extremely similar to my problem with a pig wearing perfume or the British Royal family .You can dress up shit but at the end of the day it's still shit.
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Idol, your examples suggest a certain fluidity in the definition of "day".
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
Btw my " problem" with people lauding the glories of HD here as pertains to most new movies and TV series is extremely similar to my problem with a pig wearing perfume or the British Royal family .You can dress up shit but at the end of the day it's still shit.
Yeah I know the deal, but you could have just let me mislead others into getting the wrong impression of your opinion. We had this conversation before when I first started posting here, but eventually figured out that our philosophies were traveling on vectors skew to each other. You had focused on the futility of spritzing turds, while I simply requested the cessation of coating feces onto my Nutella. I tend to be very selective about what I view, and usually avoid self-afflicted pain from much of the poorly produced art out there.
Anyways, I explained the fmt=18/fmt=22 reference in case you were unaware of those youtue url codes, but I also obscured the explanation in the case you knew. Is SwW a better tribute band than the Bon Jovi opposite group of Jon Bovi? Can I even use the term better in this case... I don't know, I'm not well-rounded when it comes to music.
Hmm, have you decided how to waste your 15,000th post? I recommend creating a BT Invite request thread, it will assuredly be the best use. I know you're tempted to, but try not to waste it on replying to me. That's why I've carefully left out any questions that try to illicit a response from you. You did notice I was careful about that, right?
Re: Although unlikely ever to be seen since it doesn't directly effect you but @dark