Originally Posted by
zot
@nntpjunkie:
We seem to disagree a lot, and it's usually over the same subject -- Highwinds. ;)
I accept that Highwinds-owned labels such as Usenetserver and Newshosting --unlike independent resellers of Highwinds service-- might not insert those ID-stamps in users posts.
But it's not always a bad thing. Did you ever notice newsgroup text posts that start with ---BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--- ? There's a reason for that....
Although copyright-violators might consider Highwinds' mandatory ID-stamps to be a grave security threat, I'm sure that many people would gladly welcome the idea of having every post "watermarked" with their identity - most notably those embroiled in adversarial discussions against bitter enemies.
I've read that years ago the "Church" of Scientology employed people to forge the identities of prominent critics posting to alt.religion.scientology, prompting many of these 'sporgery' victims to digitally sign all their posts with an encryption key. Had they posted through a Highwinds reseller, there would be no need to do this, as it would be technically impossible for Highwinds' ID-stamp (or anything else in the 'path' field) to be forged by another user.