no surprises , thats what one can expect from a top 10 f_cked up family :D King Fag me thinks...lol...Royal Weenie....
Printable View
no surprises , thats what one can expect from a top 10 f_cked up family :D King Fag me thinks...lol...Royal Weenie....
Nothing surprises me anymore with that lot. Surprised they still have the amount of support they do - its a dying monarchy to be sure. If i want the truth about the Royals, i read the SUN - ha ha :D
A bit of a misleading title,
even before this it was clear he wasn't going to be a king,
why else is his mother holding on to the throne by dear live.
You mean why is she staying alive?Quote:
Originally posted by 0blivion@15 November 2003 - 18:25
A bit of a misleading title,
even before this it was clear he wasn't going to be a king,
why else is his mother holding on to the throne by dear live.
:)
Nope. There've been a lot of noblemen who would rather other males. And some of them have been kings.
:ninja:
I am all for merging the Dutch&English royal family.
To let them get used to eachother, we place them on a far away deserted island.
All their financial recources are frozen.
We let them play Paradise Hotel with My little eye-twist(if 1 leaves, all lose....).
The winners will be the couple that won't cheat on eachother for one week.
The winners may choose a good charity(not themselfes!!) for all the Money of both
family's.
Who would be a good host for this show??
A. Michael Moore
B. Rowan Atkinson
c. Dame Edna
d. Mike Myers as Austin Powers
Find a good name for the show??
A. The Royal Flush.
B. Big Brother Beyond
C. The big Bang
D. AnimalPlanet RoyalEdition
Any ideas for a good website??
RepublicYogi
Geez, I was just reading TimeLine and here's an excerpt about King Edward II:
Did this really happened to a King?Quote:
"... His captors didn't want any sign of foul play, so they stuck a tube up his rectum and inserted a red-hot poker into his bowels until he died." Kate shivered. "He was also gay," Marek whispered, "so it was thought the manner ..."
Wow :o .Quote:
Originally posted by Darth Sushi@15 November 2003 - 10:55
Geez, I was just reading TimeLine and here's an excerpt about King Edward II:
Did this really happened to a King?Quote:
"... His captors didn't want any sign of foul play, so they stuck a tube up his rectum and inserted a red-hot poker into his bowels until he died." Kate shivered. "He was also gay," Marek whispered, "so it was thought the manner ..."
That was planned as a challenge on "Royal Flush-The Sequel!!"!!
Now i have to think of a new one, they don't know about....
JollyYogi
I am by nature a Republican, as such I have no sympathy for the "royal" family. I would happily do away with them tomorrow.
However is this thread and the replies to it suggesting that he is less fit for the job because of his sexuality ?
Are the derogatory terms about homosexuality acceptable ? I was under the impression there were rules about this sort of thing.
As I say I have no great love for the idea of inherited power or privilege. However the man's sexuality is neither here not there.