Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Squeamous
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Jenna Marbles is single-handedly responsible for every female I'm even passingly acquainted with thinking that I'm lovely.
Due to her I've taken to calling females 'sparkly-candy-dragon' or 'fluffy-muffin-monkey' or 'cutie-skittle-panda'.
You can't do it in every interaction, or it would be silly, but occasional use works like you wouldn't believe
:smilie4:
If you want to get into technicalities, then never deviate from the adjective/food/animal formula, slight alliteration helps and the only time you can use it with a guy is if you're wanting to defuse a tense situation:
'Are you staring at my missus' tits?', 'Of course not, you great big shiny-cupcake-tiger'.
You are now aware that you're 23% less socially awkward than you were when you began reading this post.
Oh that's horrible. I had to tell an ex once to stop doing that when we first met: he used to do a funny 'cute' voice as well, and I was like WTF I can't have sex with you you ghey. Pet names are fine as long as they're along the lines of 'fuckface' or 'cockmunch'. Plus anyone who knows me as well as they should if they're sleeping with me really ought to know calling me 'Fluffy' will get them a punch in the froat.
Yeah that's where he went wrong, it only works with human females :no:
I think this calls for a different formula but you'd have to put up with names from me, even if it meant a right hook.
I'd call you my shiny borg queen occular stretchy cervix-muffin or something else.
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Yeah that's where he went wrong, it only works with human females :no:
:dry:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I think this calls for a different formula but you'd have to put up with names from me, even if it meant a right hook.
I'd call you my shiny borg queen occular stretchy cervix-muffin or something else.
That falls within acceptable parameters :wub:
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Squeamous
Oh that's horrible. I had to tell an ex once to stop doing that when we first met: he used to do a funny 'cute' voice as well, and I was like WTF I can't have sex with you you ghey. Pet names are fine as long as they're along the lines of 'fuckface' or 'cockmunch'. Plus anyone who knows me as well as they should if they're sleeping with me really ought to know calling me 'Fluffy' will get them a punch in the froat.
SGG's pet is called Fluffy
Attachment 93510
Quite sweet really
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Here I was, semi-aroused by Sq's talk of punching guys in the throat for getting out of line, and you have to kill that with pics of some creepy-crawly. Isn't it enough we have Reject's text postings, now we have his caricature? :ermm:
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megabyteme
Here I was, semi-aroused by Sq's talk of punching guys in the throat for getting out of line, and you have to kill that with pics of some creepy-crawly. Isn't it enough we have Reject's text postings, now we have his caricature? :ermm:
Fluffy is not a creepy crawly :ermm:
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
My sincere apologies for the unfavorable, and unfair, comparison.
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megabyteme
My sincere apologies for the unfavorable, and unfair, comparison.
Cue another 20 page flame war :)
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Flame war? Count me in :happy:
The only problem is that I appear to like almost everyone who posts here now.
Where are all the gits :dabs:
Re: Youtube whores worth noticing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Flame war? Count me in :happy:
The only problem is that I appear to like almost everyone who posts here now.
Where are all the gits :dabs:
Where are they now Billy Deans et al