bullshit, the AMD 3000 32-bit version doesn't compare. if he wanted to match or go beyond it'd be a better idea to go with the Athlon64 3000+ instead. if i were him tho thats actually what i'd do but im waiting for Intels 64-bit to see how they compare to AMD 64. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Pitbul+14 February 2004 - 17:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Pitbul @ 14 February 2004 - 17:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@14 February 2004 - 09:14
You could consider AMD for the same performance and alot less money..if you want.
AMD easily gets more bang for buck than Intel, especially if you o/c.
Pitbul, go buy an Itanium - Intel 64 bit.
I reckon the proper non-business Intel 64 bits be a while coming anyway.