Ok but you cannot run the 266MHz FSB of the mobile at 400MHz like the non mobile one.
Printable View
Ok but you cannot run the 266MHz FSB of the mobile at 400MHz like the non mobile one.
I don't know where you find your information, my friend. As it is a pain to correct you, I shall provide a data link:Quote:
Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@26 March 2004 - 16:02
Ok but you cannot run the 266MHz FSB of the mobile at 400MHz like the non mobile one.
the 2500XP mobile can do the same and better than the non mobile, even 400 MHz+ FSB, read this: linkage
Quote:
First up are the Voltage tests. As we mentioned earlier the XP-M (indicated in green on the chart) starts at a Vcore of 1.45. When we apply the common overclock of 11x200 for 2.2 you can see we are able to run at 1.60 on the XP-M but need to run 1.70 to remain stable* on the XP. Next we ramp up to 2.4 gig at 12 x 200, now the spread widens and we need a Vcore 1.925 compared to 1.75 on the XP-M; the Mobile Barton is starting to show it's worth. The final test here in comparison ends at 2.5 gig because that is all I was willing to push the XP to. I'm sure you'll understand why when you see in order to get 2.5 gig (12.5 x 200) I had to really stretch out the Vcore to a scary 2.15 while still on air cooling. Notice the XP-M comes in nicely at 1.875, meaning there is still some head room and we'll get to that later when we push into areas where the XP dare not tread.