Enough Is A Fucking Nough

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Illuminati+10 April 2004 - 14:09--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Illuminati @ 10 April 2004 - 14:09)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Azzz@10 April 2004 - 15:54
i have sent multiple PM&#39;s on multiple occasions no-one ever replies&nbsp; :(

---

To who?

If one mod fails to get back to you, PM another one about it.

If all of them fail to do something about it, then start complaining about it in public. But (as sad as it is to say), it&#39;s rarely a case of "PM one, PM them all" - Some mods are more responsive and efficient than others. [/b][/quote]
i dont PM mods i PM the admins Mods cant access the Control Panel to make an change to the anti-spam.

ive sent PM;s to rookie and 7th and i think even BOT, and now im complaining <_<

I PMed pol jack the ripper and 7th as to my concerns, I can understand the the anti spam but it seems to cause more trouble than helps but more pressing it concerns me we have more guest than members a majority of the time
edit
Board Statistics
333 user(s) active in the past 15 minutes
220 guests, 99 members 14 anonymous members

fuck them leeches

yea at least he would do what we want :lol:


but i think the only way is to make multiple threads until something is done about it :)

i would have to agree on this - on a few occasions i have been a victim of the "feature"and i dont even post all that much anymore

i suggest everyone who has been subjected to the antispam crap PM each and every mod/admin to request it is taken off immediately.

http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=77519
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=83984
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...DE=4&MID=115876

Coadmin
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=13151

mod
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...CODE=4&MID=110
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=15341
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...ODE=4&MID=1069
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...ODE=4&MID=3448
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...ODE=4&MID=2839
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=30482
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...CODE=4&MID=557
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...ODE=4&MID=2982
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php...ODE=4&MID=5687
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=68857
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?act=M...ODE=4&MID=14250

maybe try this message:

Quote:

---

I am an active member of the Kazza-Lite Forum, and I have been affected by the feature known as "anti-spam" when I have been trying to post innocently non-spam messages.&nbsp; Please consider removing this feature as an option, as I dont see the need for it.

Thanks

---

I removed my guides till I get a answer

well done people :)

I agree with all the points made. Multiple members have left because of this anti spam script and it isnt even doing its job anyway, so get rid of it. The strongest part of FST is its community and this feature is splitting it apart. I understand that you want to stop spam scripts but the current anti spam measures just arnt working.

I am disheartened by the lack of Admin replies to this issue, considering the numbers of PMs and complaints made.

Please take notice of this topic, we make them for a reason.

RGX

ah , are you saying that to do it right is to do what you guys say&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

hmmmm, i do believe its the overall community the admins and mods are looking after, not just you lounge boys

just because its not the way you want it doesnt make it wrong,

i can see some of the steps the admins have taken , actualy helping out with the speed of the forum , because b4 it was getting bogged down and was slow to respond

perhaps a happy medium could be reached, if both sides discused matters, with a neutral party to mod the discussion

compromise makes a good community, lets all think a while and see if this could be achieved

Quote:

---

Originally posted by delphin460@10 April 2004 - 14:28
ah , are you saying that to do it right is to do what you guys say&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

hmmmm, i do believe its the overall community the admins and mods are looking after, not just you lounge boys

just because its not the way you want it doesnt make it wrong,

i can see some of the steps the admins have taken , actualy helping out with the speed of the forum , because b4 it was getting bogged down and was slow to respond

perhaps a happy medium could be reached, if both sides discused matters, with a neutral party to mod the discussion

compromise makes a good community, lets all think a while and see if this could be achieved

---

please get real <_<


how can we have a community discussion when the admins dont treat the board as a community.


were we asked before the anti-spam or any other changes for that matter were made.......NO we were not


that doesnt sound like a community to me

Quote:

---

Originally posted by delphin460@10 April 2004 - 15:28

hmmmm, i do believe its the overall community the admins and mods are looking after, not just you lounge boys

---

thanks for the generalisation, but i go into the lounge VERY rarely