Quote:
Originally posted by sara5564@19 June 2004 - 11:11
I have mixed feelings on this one...
On the one hand, there is the requirement (set down by society's moral dictum) that couples should expect total sexual faithfulness within the relationship. This I believe is based on the idea that if you love someone, they are the only people you should ever have sex with. Therefore, as our society has decided monogomy is the way forward, it is deemed unacceptable for people to have sexual relations with anyone else........therefore Todd is a bastard...
But......
It is also true to say that sexual urges, preferences etc are not so simple as one person and no other. Some people may have urges that cannot be satisfied by one person, or within a purely heterosexual relationship. The moral dilemma aside (socially constructed remember), if adequate precautions are taken, and (critically) it is not made into a public spectacle (this requires an understanding by all parties) is kept discrete and of course safe then, provided it is nothing more than sex, I see no problem. After all, it is often the 'love' and the 'lies' that get most people upset. If there is honesty and other sexual partners are not in competition for 'love' I think Todd should be allowed to fulfill his urges. If he is bisexual then fair enough, its not a disease! (Oh and maybe his wife should lighten up and join in!!! lmfao)
I know this is not a mainstream view....but I never said I was mainstream. :ph34r:
why should being a fruit make any difference? :angry: