I'm sure that, were Arafat healthy, there would be no doubt whatsoever whose money was whose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Printable View
I'm sure that, were Arafat healthy, there would be no doubt whatsoever whose money was whose.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
My Sympathies go out to his family and friends.
And to all those Israeli's and Palestinians that actually want peace.
Blessed Be
SourceQuote:
PARIS - BULLETIN: Al-Jazeera television and The Associated Press are reporting that Yasser Arafat is dead.
Earlier, as a top Islamic cleric read passages from the Quran at Yasser Arafat's hospital bedside Wednesday, a Palestinian official gave the bleakest assessment yet of the leader’s condition, saying he is suffering from kidney and liver failure and that his brain is only partially functioning.
Palestinian Foreign Minister Nabil Shaath, speaking in the West Bank city of Ramallah, said the 75-year-old Arafat was in a deep coma and that all his organs except for heart and lungs “are not functioning well.”
French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin said Wednesday night that Arafat was in his “final hours,” telling France-2 television: “I hope that we can respect the final hours of a man who is approaching death.”
As Arafat’s condition deteriorated, aides made plans to fly his body to Cairo for a funeral, then to his Ramallah headquarters. Palestinians also selected his immediate successor, saying parliament speaker Rauhi Fattouh will become temporary president of the Palestinian Authority at Arafat’s death.
:crying::crying::crying:
I heard his last request was to get buried in Jerusalem, can’t see that happening
All aboard the Peace Train?
This should be interesting. ;)
Somehow I doubt the Peace Train is gonna arrive anytime soon, j2.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
...and don't we have enough "interesting" things going on in the world already? :(
bit one sided, but interesting none the less i thought.Quote:
On November 5 1995, I went as usual to my office in East Jerusalem, next door to the Orient House, where the Palestinian leadership had its headquarters. I worked for the human rights advocate, Lea Tzemel. Lea and myself, two Jewish Israeli women working in a Palestinian neighbourhood, were already a familiar part of the street's scene. But this morning was different. When I went into the corner shop to buy cigarettes, the owner, Izzat Fraytah, greeted me with a grave face. "My condolences," he said. It took me a few seconds to realise he was conveying his sympathy for the death of the prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, who had been assassinated the night before by a rightwing radical.
Izzat was a sympathiser of the Islamist opposition organisations, and an opponent of the Oslo accords signed two years earlier by Rabin and Yasser Arafat, but his feelings were genuine. "It's a sad day for you," he said, "and for us." During the day, dozens of the street's residents climbed the four floors to our office to express their sorrow. Clients who came to inquire about the fate of their family members were apologetic for troubling me on this day of mourning.
I was overwhelmed by their decency, and embarrassed. I knew what a bitter enemy Rabin had been to the Palestinian people. He was the one, after all, who issued the order to "break the hands and legs of every stone-thrower" during the first intifada, which led Israeli soldiers to break the limbs of every young man in the villages of Beita and Hawara, leaving only one with his legs intact, so that he could run and break the news.
Many of the visitors who offered their sympathy had lost sons, husbands and brothers to Rabin's "iron fist" policies. Thousands were still, despite the Oslo accords, locked in Israeli administrative detention for "security offences". The permanent closure policy on the West Bank and Gaza was taking its economic toll on the people. And yet my neighbours' kind behaviour was not unique. One by one the leaders of the Palestinian Authority were interviewed by the Israeli media, talking of their grief. Arafat got special permission to visit the bereaved widow, Lea Rabin, in Tel Aviv, and sat with her, tears in his eyes.
All these memories came back to me as Yasser Arafat lay on his deathbed, unaware of the glee expressed by most Israelis. The Israeli government announced, as soon as he was flown to Paris, that he would not be allowed to be buried in Jerusalem. Inbal Gavrieli, member of the Knesset, shouted at Ahmad Tibi, an Arab member of the Knesset, that Arafat was "a dog". Many Israeli politicians followed suit with insults directed at the dying Palestinian leader. Israeli comedians, who nowadays shy away from political satire directed at their own leaders, have been mocking Arafat with the most degrading impersonations. A festive atmosphere has taken over the country.
"Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth," says the Old Testament, but too many Israelis are blinded by hatred and self-righteousness to remember these beautiful words. The consequences of Arafat's death festival will haunt us for years. And for this cruel folly Israelis and Palestinians are likely to pay in the currency of innocent blood.
Sharon, the one who said Arafat was the obstacle to peace, now says that even with Arafat gone nothing will change unless "they (the Palestinian leaders) wage a war on terror".
More preconditions. Why am I not surprised.
Note to Jonno - look, we do criticise other nations. ;)
Sharron is endeavouring to dictate the terms and borders of any proposed Palestinian State. Clearly that is not going to smooth the way for any Palestinian leader to take the deal back to his people regardless of how democratic and peaceful the Palestinians are.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
Sharron is offerring Gaza and taking a fair chunk of the West Bank. The Palestinians want Gaza, the West Bank and the right to return to homes and villages they fled in 48 and 67. Given that many of these homes have been occupied by Israelis and to allow the Palestinians back would upset domestic politics (i.e. they won't vote Likud) there is little chance of this happening.
The only workable compromise is a wholly Palestinian West Bank and Gaza without the "right to return". Sharron is supported by the far right whose main power base is in the orthodox settlements in the West Bank. Even if Sharron was of a mind to give up the all of the West Bank (which he isn't) then he would have political difficulties trying to achieve it.
In addition to this, Bush has sent mixed messages regarding the West Bank, hinting that the Israelis could stay. The European position (including the UK) is that the Israelis should observe UN resolutions and remove their settlements.
The upshot of this is that whilst there is a possibility that movement might occur (as Arafat refused to concede the "right to return") but unless the Israelis concede the West Bank there will be nothing to discuss.
I did hear some junior Whitehouse spokesman say that "too much is made of the settlements" and that they are only "a few houses" - the reverse of this of course is that if it is such a little deal why not move them? Any cursory glance at a West Bank map will show a polka dot pattern. There are settlements scattered all over the place making it impossible to set up a unified Palestinian State while they are still there.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/h...heckpoints.stm