The Secret Recordings Of Pope John Paul II

probly not...

i dont think ive seen anything about yasser arafat on here :ermm:

tbh about things i dont be believe the occupation of priesthood makes you more likely to be a peadophile than other professions. i the last few years weve caught at least 3 musical nonces out. if anyway can find me statistical evidence to prove that priest=monster, do post.



btw i am feeling grumpy, stfu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

If you enjoy Pope = Pedophile humour, yes.

Otherwise I wouldn't bother.

---

Trolling then?

Ok.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheDave

i dont think ive seen anything about yasser arafat on here :ermm:

tbh about things i dont be believe the occupation of priesthood makes you more likely to be a peadophile than other professions. i the last few years weve caught at least 3 musical nonces out. if anyway can find me statistical evidence to prove that priest=monster, do post.



btw i am feeling grumpy, stfu

---

I dont think or hope that no one is suggesting that priest equals monster. There has been a lot of press recently in the UK and the USA about child abuse by roman Catholic priests. Not helped by the Church denial. This may be the the reason for the introduction of this thread. People must remember that you are going to have this type of thing in any profession where men are 'in charge' of boys. The percentage of priests involved is miniscule, nevertheless undesireable, in comparison to the vast majority of decent hard working people in the priesthood. The same thing occurs in the scout movement and people in charge of youth football. These paedophiles join these organisations for the sole purpose of furthering their evil interests. :(

kinda thinking along those lines

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

I dont think or hope that no one is suggesting that priest equals monster. There has been a lot of press recently in the UK and the USA about child abuse by roman Catholic priests. Not helped by the Church denial. This may be the the reason for the introduction of this thread. People must remember that you are going to have this type of thing in any profession where men are 'in charge' of boys. The percentage of priests involved is miniscule, nevertheless undesireable, in comparison to the vast majority of decent hard working people in the priesthood. The same thing occurs in the scout movement and people in charge of youth football. These paedophiles join these organisations for the sole purpose of furthering their evil interests. :(

---

It concerns about 4 % of the group, wich is, shocking enough, average....(also

in other proffessions........)

In the us, however, there are 40.000 priests..........

Most of the abusers were not known pedophiles before they joint the

priesthood.

My biggest blame towards the leaders is the fact it was covered up, not

ignored. Known offenders were relocated in the past, hence given a new

playground to mess with.

Same thing happened with social workers in the sixties.

Mind you, not all childabusers are pedophiles by nature.

In many cases the -sad or sick- circumstances makes the criminal.

Offending priests live in an unnatural environment, with unnatural rules.

Just like not all jailbirds taking the backentrance of their cellmates are gay.


As long as humanity fails to build a healthy society, we'll have to live with the

remains of that failure.

That 'll be for quite some while, i fear.


Yogi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yogi

It concerns about 4 % of the group, wich is, shocking enough, average....(also

in other proffessions........)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yogi

Mind you, not all childabusers are pedophiles by nature.

In many cases the -sad or sick- circumstances makes the criminal.

Offending priests live in an unnatural environment, with unnatural rules.

Just like not all jailbirds taking the backentrance of their cellmates are gay.

---

Bit contradictory. If it was the specific environment that makes them more likely to offend then shouldn't the percentage be above the national average.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Bit contradictory. If it was the specific environment that makes them more likely to offend then shouldn't the percentage be above the national average.

---

Those specific circumstances also occur in other area's than just the

examples mentioned.

So 4% is an average for jobs that involve a position of trust and deal with young lads on a one to one basis?

You should have said. What's the national average for other jobs, like office workers and air hostesses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

So 4% is an average for jobs that involve a position of trust and deal with young lads on a one to one basis?

You should have said. What's the national average for other jobs, like office workers and air hostesses.

---

Sorry, Manker, i'm not going there.