PS2's online to Xbox Live is a bad comparison since PS2 doesn't have a streamlined online service.
PS2 does have some paid for online content.
Xbox Live is the best by far which is why Sony will be emulating it soon.
Printable View
PS2's online to Xbox Live is a bad comparison since PS2 doesn't have a streamlined online service.
PS2 does have some paid for online content.
Xbox Live is the best by far which is why Sony will be emulating it soon.
xbox live becuz u get what you pay for,sonys servers suck balls
xbox live anyday, PS2 online really sucks cuz servers lag like a bitch, u dont get that many content or updates. as for xbox live, you get what you pay for as suprafreak said, but its worth it.
xbox live is the victor in my opinion. more people, better presentation, better stat tracking. like you i have nfsu 1 and 2, i played them once online and never went back, it's just that bad.
ive played socom a lot and found no problems with it, it depends on the game, some allow modems, socom doesnt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peerzy
also, how is xbconnect, i see people saying its a small user base
X-Box live is my fave yeah, it just seems put together well, bit more than the PS2 imo.
As for console versus PC, PC I suppose is the winner, but I like online play with consoles alot more. With PC's it seems like every developer just releases half assed games because they know they can fix all their shit later with an unlimited amount of patches. With console games you get what you get, and they usually get it right the FIRST time, usually.
Some of the time. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Haz
It just doesnt feel right playing a FPS on a console. Very sac-religsh if you ask me. Consoles are only good for the GTA series. It feels just wrong playing GTA on PC.
I'd prefer Live because the servers arent laggy at all, even on wireless. Btw y was my last post deleted?? :blink:
But you see, you have made this post far better :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gam3Guy
....your last one was lame, and added nothing to the discussion.