Printable View
The thread was about regarding the Helicopter crash which, might I add at this point gave DIRECT LINKS to video's showing US SOLDIERS being executed.
I think people started forgetting this very point. A video is better than a picture?
The picture was also relevant to the thread as it showed a dead Iraqi. I am still wondering where "donkey sex" comes into anything relating to this, but each to their own I guess :)
Hell the video had graven images of soldiers and showed the cold blooded killing of another. :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai
"I was going with the flow of traffic"
Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbes
Who the hell just casually strolls through a thread with Helicopter Crash with links on the first post directing you to an execution.
You guys have your priorities all WRONG.
I got moderated for a picture, yet the videos were fine yes? :lookaroun
What a joke. It really is a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai
"Donkey sex" was a comment that relates to the rule that on this forum you can only show tits, not vagina. "Donkey sex" is way beyond the rules of what people can post here.
Then again, people think thay can post pictures of splattered brains.
If you can only post tits here, why to you think that splattered human brains is appropriate. That is a gross lack of judgement.
A link is fine, as long as people know what they are getting into.
edit: never followed the link
I'm not sure what or where the picture in question was. I didn't see it, so on that point I'm not judging.
What I can say is that I've seen links to videos showing executions, suicides, posts containing pictures of mutilations, posts with links to various graphic sites, and more, when the links/pictures have been removed with a warning. I've removed them myself in the past. I've seen links to graphic videos left alone and nothing done about them, despite complaint. I guess what I'm saying is that I don't often see someone moderated for this, unless it's been done repeatedly, especially when it's a long standing member who's never even been moderated before.
I'd have to agree that a PM would have served better in this case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NikkiD
Wasn't a link, but a picture of brains blown out. You scroll down and there it is.
Thank you NikkiD.
That's all it would have taken, to be honest.
Info: The videos in question were direct links meaning they loaded up as soon as the website was loaded up, with no option to not view it, especially on a DSL connection.
If you have something against said member, you piss and complain.Quote:
Originally Posted by hobbes
If not, you pm him and advise.
Pretty simple.
Repeat offender, moderation...leading to ban if still repeating.
Keep in mind what I was moderated for....not being helpful. :dry:
So, I guess you just don't "get it".Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai
Links require active downloading.
Posting graphic pictures is a passive event.
Just realize you fucked up and move on. geez.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I said it was a gross lapse of judgement. I gave our rules on sexual content for perspective.
I said no more.
I didn't want to see the pictures. I didn't pm or complain. I thought that he was an idiot.