The pet-name you've given him almost makes the guy sound lovable :ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Printable View
The pet-name you've given him almost makes the guy sound lovable :ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
You find Rummies loveable.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Sounds like a name you'd give to a wet nosed Cocker Spaniel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Why dont you?
How many Americans are killed by Americans?
Yet the Justice Departments budget is 5% of the Defence Budget.
Your Country spends about 50% of ALL defence spending in the world (and those figures do not count what is paid to Haliburton etc according to that report), yet wont fund a Universal Health System for its own citizens or pump money into Departments that would save many more US lives...
Thats just perverse.. :ph34r:
One of these was arrested because he was a Dr and said he'd treat members of Al Queda if he went to Saudi.Quote:
Then what about the men in California who were arrested today for terror links?
Fancy that, being arrested for saying he'd follow the oath he took... :ph34r:
Past this I don't agree with you :snooty:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Wrong. The other men were from Pakistan and were arrested for immigration violations.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Then we're talking about a different two men, the two i'm on about are US citizens.... police state :PQuote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
However, with your two.. which was it?
Immigration Violations or Terror Links..? There was no military spending involved if they were arrested for immigration violations 1st...
It's a good time to be invested in the military industrial complex that shit don't sprout like mushrooms. :cool2:
you can "allegedly" this and "allegedly" that until the cows come home. wake up and get a clue until they're actually convicted of something. and then wait another year after that for the U.S. Justice Department to review the case and make sure it wasn't just a matter of the prosecution fabricating evidence, burying other evidence, and railroading the defendants like they did with The Disneyland Case.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
one day after your post:
one day. it took the FBI ONE DAY to withdraw that claim. you should've been back in here on June 9th, to correct yourself. you know, "oops, my mistake. just 'cause there are allegations, that doesn't prove that a couple of guys in Lodi, California are planning to attack supermarkets. you really can't believe everything you hear."Quote:
The FBI also dropped the suggestion, included in the first version of the affidavit, that the Hayats were considering hospitals and large food stores as terror targets.
At Wednesday's news conference, Slotter said that there was no evidence that those facilities have been primarily targeted "or are especially vulnerable to attack." He said the FBI had no evidence to date of any specific plans, targets or timing of a possible attack.