-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines.
Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.
Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.
If you say so; I really can't dispute that.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
if a man gets a hardon looking at another man, we shouldn't really try and work logic into the situation :smilie4:
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.
Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.
If you say so; I really can't dispute that.
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
:lol:
there's been a lot of harshness on the forum recently, teh fook mang?
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines.
Why not. There's nothing unnatural about any of those.
Puting your babymaker into another guy's shitehole certainly is.
I don't think so. If we lived life naturally we wouldn't purposely stick pieces of metal in ourselves and keep them their, neither would we put ink under our skin. That's not natural, it has no point in the great scheme of things just like a guy sticking his dick in another guy's ass, it serves a purpose but it has no real point to it.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
If you say so; I really can't dispute that.
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.
Thank God you're not really angry with me.
I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.
Thank God you're not really angry with me.
I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
That'll teach you
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
:lol:
there's been a lot of harshness on the forum recently, teh fook mang?
Get off the bandwagon and actually say something, or are you such a cawkless bastard that you don't want to be an individual.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
:lol:
there's been a lot of harshness on the forum recently, teh fook mang?
Get off the bandwagon and actually say something, or are you such a cawkless bastard that you don't want to be an individual.
hmmm....
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Thank God you're not really angry with me.
I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
That'll teach you
Surely. :)
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
Is a man sticking his cawk into a females arse wrong?
After she has given him a written permission note of course.
Don't know.
Doesn't qualify as homosexual sex, though.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
That'll teach you
Surely. :)
You're smiling now, but just wait until you make a typo, he'll have you right up the ar... some baby making bit
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.
Thank God you're not really angry with me.
I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.
I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Surely. :)
You're smiling now, but just wait until you make a typo, he'll have you right up the ar... some baby making bit
I'm using protection.
I have a dictionary about somewhere; it's an old manual model, but I'll just knock the dust off 'er and she'll be good as new.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
Get off the bandwagon and actually say something, or are you such a cawkless bastard that you don't want to be an individual.
hmmm....
I'm takng that as a yes.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Thank God you're not really angry with me.
I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.
I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.
ffs only 2 hours into sunday and i have 6 choices for my word of the week, you big word talking bastard
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Thank God you're not really angry with me.
I thought you were serious for a moment. :)
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.
I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.
Have I mentioned I have spare hyphens?
If you need them, that is.
Some people eschew them, but we're already off-topic...
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
Oh trust me, your supercilious badly written condescension has annoyed me for long enough.
I'm not angry, I'm just fed up with pandering to half-wits with delusions of adequacy.
ffs only 2 hours into sunday and i have 6 choices for my word of the week, you big word talking bastard
Yeah, not too bad for a left-fielder.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
What's the prostate glad for?
for you?
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by maebach
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
What's the prostate glad for?
for you?
well done
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by maebach
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
What's the prostate glad for?
for you?
:ermm: Not to make assumptions but I don't think I have one.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
Quote:
Originally Posted by maebach
for you?
well done
Oh, now I get it.
...:ermm:
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by callum
well done
Oh, now I get it.
...:ermm:
why did it take you so long. it was mentioned enough time for a canadian to pick up on it
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
I thought he was ignoring the typo, which gave his comment a different meaning.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
it's just to complicated if you think like that, i think
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
you bastard JP, it's said Homosexual Intercourse - is... callum, on the front page for the past 2 hours.
this won't have helped.
1 hour maybe, fucking board clock
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
there is nothing at all wrong with being attracted to the same sex, nothing.
if anything, it makes more sense in a sexual pleasing way as you know more about their body. as long as both are consenting adults, there isn't any reason why they shouldn't do as they wish. (to each other)
the narrow minded views of the bible needs updating fast or it's not going to survive for much longer. traditional services, like weddings and christenings, are slowly becoming something done to keep the older generation happy.
besides, you're not actually in love until you've had either anal or oral secks. :unsure:
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Yes.
I thought everyone knew that already... =/
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Homosexual Intercourse is very wrong... :sick:
I may be in the minority here, but even giving anal to a women is disgusting and unnatural to me. :ermm:
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
I have to say that I don't fancy the idea of http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...ecksowl6ix.gif
its quite uncomfortable as it is for stuff coming out,without things being shoved iin.
The muscles in that region are designed to push stuff out,having had the Dr check up there for prostate problems with just a finger,I can tell you I wouldn't be letting anything else be shoved up there,couldn't walk properly for a couple of hours afterwards.
I think anal intercourse is wrong but homosexual loves ok if that's the way your made up.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by missie
there is nothing at all wrong with being attracted to the same sex, nothing.
What's that got to do with anything. We're talking about cawk up the arse action.
All your "Bible" stuff is just clouding the issue. The arse is for disposing of shite, not for receiving of cawk. Scientific Fact.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by maebach
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
What's the prostate glad for?
for you?
zomg. that's way too clever for a canadian :O
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fromagepas
Quote:
Originally Posted by missie
there is nothing at all wrong with being attracted to the same sex, nothing.
What's that got to do with anything. We're talking about cawk up the arse action.
All your "Bible" stuff is just clouding the issue. The arse is for disposing of shite, not for receiving of cawk. Scientific Fact.
Yeah! ;)
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
The anus may be the only place you can hide your most precious item(s) in times of need.
:pulpfiction, serbia, concentrationcamp, smuggling, etc:
and if you calculate the size and weight of your largest ever faeces you may appreciate the magnitude of its storage potential, hence a cawk is nothing, (unless jeff stryker needs to store his most precious belonging)
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 100%
The anus may be the only place you can hide your most precious item(s) in times of need.
:pulpfiction, serbia, concentrationcamp, smuggling, etc:
and if you calculate the size and weight of your largest ever faeces you may appreciate the magnitude of its storage potential, hence a cawk is nothing, (unless jeff stryker needs to store his most precious belonging)
You may store your valuables up your bumhole, that's a matter entirely for you.
I prefer a wall safe.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fromagepas
I prefer a wall safe.
Why would you want to store a wall safe up your rectum :blink:
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by enoughfakefiles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fromagepas
I prefer a wall safe.
Why would you want to store a wall safe up your rectum :blink:
Safe sex.
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
:rollthedrums:
/edit i knew i should've of done the pyecost line
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
-
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?