maybe there should be a review for each tracker, with a little bit more info, comparing to other sites also (like "TL is better in content from this site")Quote:
Originally Posted by p3st
cuz IMO the reviews ATM don't help much.
Printable View
maybe there should be a review for each tracker, with a little bit more info, comparing to other sites also (like "TL is better in content from this site")Quote:
Originally Posted by p3st
cuz IMO the reviews ATM don't help much.
Look for example torrentbits.ro, is torrentbits.ro better then TL, TB, (..)?
The awnser is no, it isnt, not even close, but the different is that trorrentbits.ro is 3.5 and tl is 2, and why is that? Because it was signups closed till 2015... Does that make him better? I guess it does... :(
well thats just stupid it should be removedQuote:
Originally Posted by slau
yeah but when trading you look for rarity rather than quality.Quote:
Originally Posted by slau
that's why there should be 2 different threads (but again, even on the worth trade... quality should be considered a little).
for example (i only heard that, really don't know), i understood that revolt is not a good site at all. but it's a 4 level tracker, ppl might trade their level 4 and get disappointed.
3333 is getting the point. The rest of you aren't.
When you are trading, you consider how hard it is to get an invite to the site you want. Quality at this point is not a factor at all.
I think we need an equal post with ranks etc but then only with how good the tracker is and not how hard it is to get in.
I know corey is making a topic with the trackers and what content they have etc but it's not really a rate of how good the sites are :)
maybe after we got the 2 threads..
in each thread after the name there will be the other thread's rating.
for example on the worth trade:
Level 2:...TL (4)
it's level 2 on the worth, and 4 on quality.
can we call that a 6 out of 10???Quote:
Originally Posted by 3333
simple i think
don't think soQuote:
Originally Posted by Green Goblincan we call that a 6 out of 10???Quote:
Originally Posted by 3333
simple i think
cuz something can be 5 on quality, and 1 on rarity...
and then 4 rarity can look like 5 quality... you can't know.
or maybe like this "TL 6 (2,4)"
but it will look complicated
I have the best idea how to improve it :):)
you should do a poll on every site and every member who will get in can vote his opinion...
:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):)
I Think that if there are some screen shots so we can see the trackers from inside, there aren't enough information about trackers. so many people wants to know more information about the trackers links. etc...
QFTQuote:
Originally Posted by gino77
The current thread is fine I think, you can add more trackers base on their rarity. I would think we should have another thread rated by the contents of the trackers so that people not interested in trading will know what the are looking for.
I saw some people said some trackers in current thread are overrated, I dont think so. This is the thread for rarest trackers why people complain about their contents when they get in ( ex. TB, U*** ) come on guys!
That would be a little risky i think and im sure the trackers wouldnt want that. as a precaution i wouldnt do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by omarino
Sound good but you would have to add more variables. rSR is hard to seed back on, that lowers its value a little. YOu would also have to calculate rarity into it more.Quote:
Originally Posted by p3st
do you have ScT and FTN? and download speed on new releases is another story.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaffrey
e: Sorry about the tripple post. i just went through the whole thread. :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi Pheo
i support ur idea..definitely there should be another thread rated by the contents of trackers an should be made sticky:)
The current thread is fine for me too. Rarity is the main point of this thread. If you want to know which best content/Pre-times/Speeds trackers search for Corey's thread, I propose make it sticky.
2 notes:
I think its time to put FTN on level 5.
You should add SnowTigers to level 3.5.
Keep up the good work dudes. :)
Also as said before you definitely have to mention donations:
1) sites that provide 3 months free leech with every donation
2) sites that give you 5 GB every 5 bucks or so
3) sites that just give you a star next to your name and HAVE IN THEIR FRONT PAGE MONTHLY EXPENSES AND TOTAL AMOUNT RECEIVED THIS MONTH
i was really pleased with all the comments and suggestions made in that thread and i am going to comment on the ideas that i have seen in that thread in order to improve the current list
let's start
i have seen alot of requests about that so we will add some more trackers soon but due to the large numbers of available trackers on the web so we are going to add the trackers that is requested here in FSTQuote:
Originally Posted by tctosson
also u can suggest all the new trackers that u may like to add to the thread and every member can post his opinion about having these trackers or not
some trackers may have problems regarding that but we may be willing to post screenshots to trackers that doesn't have problems about that as it may help alittle to figure the Trackers that someone might needQuote:
Originally Posted by omarino
well,it's kinda good but it's kinda difficult to make because there is 0-day trackers,music trackers,movies trackers so how can we rate the content of each one also there are alot of trackers which haven't pre-time like oink,KG,...Quote:
Originally Posted by p3st
also alot of Trackers which are given for free will be high in the sky like TL for example
i think so, Corey's Thread will help about the trackers content,pre times and so also the Current Reviews in The Sticky thread have rankings for pre times,content,rarity and speed and for those who hasn't we encourage the great members who helped us and posts reviews about some trackers to add this information to their reviews as it will helpQuote:
Originally Posted by Shadowfire
can u plz inform us of the defects in the reviews that u don't like sothat we can fix themQuote:
Originally Posted by 3333
if we did that then we need more than 50 threads with polls to achieve that also what happen if atracker open signups like iplay which opened acouple of days agoQuote:
Originally Posted by asafisraeli123
i think the current system regarding that which enables any member to list his current ranking for trackers and those who came after can comment on his suggestion to reach the best rankings
well,i don't think most members are keen on knowing the donation information but if alot of members want that in the reviews then we will work on thatQuote:
Originally Posted by sert
i think most of u consider the rarity as the first option for ranking the thread ,we will take care more of the content of the trackers and we will work out to improve the current reviews with any information u need
i think that by combining the rarity and checking the reviews for the other rankings like content,speed,pre-times will help to figure out exactly what trackers every one will need
About the Trackers that may be over-rated or under-rated :u can post in the sticky thread about your suggestion of the ranking of acertain tracker and members can comment on that and we will work on to make each tracker in it's correct postition
i will make another thread also soon for u guys to choose the trackers that u would like to add to the thread and the trackers which get high comments will be added to the list
I hope i see more of your comments and suggestions to improve the thread :)
not 50 threads with polls
just do it in the first page.
or second.
it will be great.
what about the thing i said?
near every tracker, write also the rating of the other thread
as I said before..
Level 2: ...TL (4)....
level 2 on rarity, 4 on overall (content pre times speeds whatever).
good idea 3333
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by p3st
Yes TL must go up 2 level , TL is the best of many many trackers for 0day and good fastQuote:
Originally Posted by 3333
You should put TL in the considering :yup::yup::yup::yup::yup::yup::yup::yup:
Think the thread Corey is working on will balance out most all concerns with the current thread. Then members can read through both pins and get a complete picture. Hope that thread is done soon or at least the bulk of it. Additionally both threads should have links to each other.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowfire
It might be possible in situations where a trackers rarity is far from its worth it could be adjusted. Though I think in these situations the tracker shouldnt even be on the list since theres no point of a rare tracker with no worth even being listed...Quote:
Originally Posted by 3333
That's agreat idea and i like it alot as it will gives anyone choices to see the value of each trackerQuote:
Originally Posted by 3333
I will work on doing that and adding the overall content between () and for those special trackers which have acertain content only like KG,oink,TT and others i would put them in Colored Brackets () sothat everyone can recognize that this tracker is not an ordinary 0-day tracker but it's atracker that has acertain category
The reviews available also in the thread will help clarify each tracker
i would really love to see your comments on that idea made by 3333 before working on it and whether u like it or not :)
yeh 3333 have a point here :)
if i would made the list i would down FTWR to 2 or something worth shit i don't care it's rared
I totally agree with 3333 idea
its a great idea and it will help many users
ok,i am going to finish that new layer soon,the ranking betwwen () will be for overall review only and () will be for special dedicatede trackers like oink,KG,TT and ()* will mean that this tracker have files and content which mayn't be available on other trackers
I think that this bracket rating system will work great! :)
it's not anymore 3333's idea... j0ker's :P
glad you liked it.
ya add more trackers
and please tell us what is the mechanism that you use to rate the trackers
???
The new Beta Version of The rankings is done and it will be posted here later today or tomorrow after making some slight changes
The new Trackers that u will like to add will be choosed and added depending on Your choices and there will be more detailed information about that in anew thread but just after we finish the current improvement and let all members give their opinions about it
The new ranking will combine the current rarity rank and besides each tracker there will be its overall raking depending on content,speed,pre-times and rarity also special trackers which have certain releases like oink,BMTV,KG and others will be identified easilyQuote:
Originally Posted by nadeem111as
also the 0-day trackers which may have exclusive releases which man't be found on other trackers will also be identified easily
and as i have said before the new beta thread will be posted here later today or tomorrow for all of u to make your comments and suggestions
thx :)
btw, when i said more info about the trackers, and that the review are not helping.. it was more like...
if the reviewers could add their opinion... what's the SLR on 0day torrents few minutes after they're uploaded, how many seeders/leechers on a regular torrent.
cuz some sites have many active peers, but other trackers only few.
hi
i am going to post the improvemnts applied to the what invites are worth here to see what do u think of it before applying it
as far as u can see,i have implented an overall ranking besides the rarity ranking that is currentky used ,the new overall ranking will be either
() for 0-day trackers
() for dedicated trackers like oink for music,bitmetv,TT ,etc
()* for 0-day Trackers which have content which mayn't exist in alot of other trackers
The Current Ranking now between () after the edits is for the following
content+Speed+Pre-times
while the rarity ranking is our main levels ranking
i would like u to comment on the current overall rankings sothat if anything needs to be edited :)
What Invites Are Worth
Maintained by: Buggyme and Patriot foreve
This Scale Is To Rate Sites From 1 To 5
To Contribute To This Post
- 1 being the easiest to get an invite or account and 5 the hardest.
- This has nothing to do with the contents of the trackers.
Tracker Reviews NEW!
- Post site name and number according to value you think site has.
- Choices are not definitive so anyone could drop an opinion.
- Make suggestions what trackers should be added.
- Not all trakers will be in this list.
THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TOO LITERALLY.
- Trackers listed in BOLD have reviews, just simply click on it to see the review.
- Reviews are for FST members only! Please DO NOT copy it or use it on another site.
It's just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)
Do NOT ask the URL of the sites specified in this thread.
Level 1 •••••
These sites are open for sign ups. Any users looking to join any of those sites can simply go to the site and register.
Bitsoup(3.5), ILoveTorrents(3), docs.torrents.ro(3.5), Midnight Torrents(3) and countless others...
Level 2 •••••
Accounts at these sites are very easy to obtain. If you ask for an invite/account here in this board, chances are you will get one for free.
TL(4.5), FL(3), TauriTracker(3), Demonoid(4)*, ChronicTracker(3), TD(3), ST(3.5), Bitspyder(3.5), Learnbits(3.5), SCC(3.5), HorrorChannel(3.5), TVJunkies(3), UKNova(3.5), Elbitz(3.5), SITR(2.5), BitHDTV(3.5), PussyTorrents(4), DH(3), HT(2.5), Quorks(2), XboxSky(4), etc.
2.5: A-L(2.5), VIPMusic(3), Music-Vids(3), TTi(3.5), CO(3), ThePlace(3.5), TheVault(3.5), ExtremeBits(3), TB(3.5), PotUK(3), BTMusic(3), TVTorrents(4), TvT.ro(3), FinDVDR(2.5), RevTT(4),Sweloaders(3), SoftTorrents(3), ProAudioTorrents(3.5) etc.
Level 3 •••••
Accounts at these sites are harder to obtain due to various reasons. However, it is still fairly easy to get provided that you offer a site with the same value in return.
rSR(3), CZone(3.5), iPLAY(4), BitMe(4.5), BitMeTV(5), OiNK(4), Pisexy(3)*, TS-Tracker(3), x264(3), FileFight(3), HDBits(3)*, FileZone(3), KrayTracker(3), etc.
3.5: TT(3.5), PT(4), KG(3.5), Swebits(3.5), TorrentBits(3.5), RMVBusters(3.5) etc.
Level 4 •••••
Accounts at these sites are quite difficult to obtain. It may take you a while to get into these sites.
SweDVDR(4), FSC(3.5)*, WB(3.5), E***o(4), Revolt(1), NB(4), IT(3.5), Thor's Land(3)*, etc.
4.5: FTN(5)*, FB(4)*, RP(4)*, FTWR(3)*, etc.
Level 5 •••••
Getting an account at these sites are very difficult if not impossible. Consider yourselves lucky if you have an account at these trackers.
ScT(5)* and UK-T(3).
:yahoo:
If this ranking is solely based on rarity, only U*** should be on 5 and FTN and SCT should be at the same level - so both 5 or both 4.5.
If content plays somewhat a role, FTN and SCT should be both on 5 and U*** should be on 4.5 or 4.
BitMeTV and Oink should be 3.5, perhaps Bitme as well.
From rarity point of view, I see no difference between levels 2 and 2.5 - they can all be obtained very easily. It is true some have better content and maybe that's why they're rated 2.5 but I'm not sure content plays a role here.
i Think We Must Find Any Way To Solve Spies Problem
:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o
Please read what is bold.Quote:
Originally Posted by crossfade
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot foreve