I can't drive, but neither can those army fools and they've had training:
http://xs320.xs.to/xs320/07416/1161dierakd8.jpg
Printable View
I can't drive, but neither can those army fools and they've had training:
http://xs320.xs.to/xs320/07416/1161dierakd8.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by benchez
Spike Milligan army memoires
Senior Officer "What the bloody hell is going on here?"
Young Officer saluting "Sah! We fucked it up Sah!!"
Senior Officer "Carry on"
:lol: Thx biggles that really needed a good caption
:O Are you like Lewis Hamilton.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairbautt
Do I look like Lewis Hamilton
http://ww2.tagheuer.com/_img/Ambassa...s-hamilton.jpg
herbert's a merkin, he'll only know nascar drivers:rolleyes:
edit: :o
edit2: I bet he had to google the name to see who he was
I haven't a clue.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairbautt
Are you an attractive, talented, young millionaire sportsman.
<: obvious jp liking lewis hamilton on pole joke here:>
HomophobeQuote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
Racist
Southerner
Reported:no:
:lol::earl:
ya rly :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
American driving doesn't count
You're only allowed to go as fast as 50mph, ergo, you'd never go above 3rd gear :P
Anyway,
had my theory test yesterday morning and passed with...
50/50!!!!
I got a 100% correct!!
@JP: That pinky thumb thing makes sense. I've got it figured out now though. Just wasn't used to having a fairly new gearbox, as opposed to one that is about to fall to bits :lol:
It's set to work that way, with springs and witchcraft.
If you put it into neutral, from any gear, it will naturally fall between third and fourth.
Congrats on the theory btw. Way to go you.
Is the hazard perception part still ghey?
Yeah, it still is.
It's filmed with a normal camera from a moving car, so every time the car moves direction to quikcly the screen goes all blurry :lol:
That's to simulate you being hepped up on goofballs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skweeky
What are goofballs? :huh:
I've no idea I read it off the Simpsons. Chief Wiggum said it to Ned Flanders if memory serves.
Fuck that was sad http://www.snpp.com/guides/hepped.up.html
I'm not clicking any of your links anymore :snooty:
:lol:
Well copy this into google - goofballs
I mean the "click when you see a potential hazard and then again if it becomes a hazard" thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skweeky
It didn't work properly, it only seemed to count "potential hazards" as things right infront of the camera, like it didn't count a truck with it's hazard lights on down the road as a hazard even tho' it clearly was.
That wouldn't be a potential hazard tho' it would be a hazard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper BoI mean the "click when you see a potential hazard and then again if it becomes a hazard" thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skweeky
It didn't work properly, it only seemed to count "potential hazards" as things right infront of the camera, like it didn't count a truck with it's hazard lights on down the road as a hazard even tho' it clearly was.
Yeah, you're still supposed to do that
It's dubious, because it acknowledges your click, but you don't know what it is acknowledging; the pedestrian on the pavement of the car parked on the road in the distance.
Got 68 out of 75 on that bit.
I just clicked everytime I saw something that changed lol
what about a kid in the road on a bike? that was classed as a potential hazard even tho' it was obviously a hazard/Quote:
Originally Posted by SextentThat wouldn't be a potential hazard tho' it would be a hazard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
The way it was explained on the intro video was ;
'Click when you see a potential hazard and click again when the situation changes'
So you'd have to click for a cyclist on the road, and click again if he looks over his shoulder to change direction.
I can't remember what it said when I did it, it was all in DOS anyway and everything was all fields back then.
I don't understand why they just can't let you click on the hazards on the screen instead of having little flags at the bottom :huh:
To eliminate any need for mouse skills, some people don't use computers often, like.
How is that a hazard, you would plough thro' her in jig time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bowhat about a kid in the road on a bike? that was classed as a potential hazard even tho' it was obviously a hazard/Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
a hazard cause i might scratch my paintwork, obviousment.Quote:
Originally Posted by SextentHow is that a hazard, you would plough thro' her in jig time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
I still think the fact that you can't see out any window other than the windscreen and that you can't see your mirrors is a hazard, like
(the footage you see on the test is like you're watching from on the dashboard)
:blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Skweeky
A lot of people think that's the limit throughout the USA, mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairbautt:blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Skweeky
Or 55, some people think it's 55, but still throughout the USA.
Apparently. It's 'bout 35-45 on most roads. Small highways: 50. Interstate: 70.
'Least 'round here it is.
55 is rare.
Anyways I've done ~115 in my car. yep yep...:smoke:
'k it was more like 116, tbh.
pfft, my mondeo did more than that ffs.
edit: +1 e-penis inch