Not sure SWEDVDR should DESERVE to be at Level 8? They Banned all Non Swedish Ip's ay least the New ones and so old ones too.....
Still abunch of A$$holes as far as I am concern
Printable View
Not sure SWEDVDR should DESERVE to be at Level 8? They Banned all Non Swedish Ip's ay least the New ones and so old ones too.....
Still abunch of A$$holes as far as I am concern
So Skizo I think you might have found a contender for someone to look after the WIAW thread, grind$ofine has already put in a huge amount of (largely unthanked) effort into creating a more balanced thread, and certainly has an opinion on how the thread should be run, looks to me to be a candidate ?
I agree with not stickying it and I realize the reason he wouldn't, but why make this new topic after my thread died down....Quote:
Originally Posted by squirr3l
What I made was a more non-negotiable WIAW based on rarity of INVITES, I said I didn't want it to replace the WIAW because it was so much different, since obviously the WIAW contains accounts.... if Skizo wants to take out the account factor, then it's basically my version or it leads directly to what my version's purpose was.
And I just feel like it's kind of rude to change the WIAW into something that is the project I was working on and had support for... especially when Skizo could have said something like "that's a nice idea to put sites with invites disabled higher than sites that are rare but still have invites"... things could have been worked out..
But instead his only input was "No." in response to someone asking for a sticky and he didn't even answer why not.
I realize it wasn't going to get stickied along with the original WIAW, but if my idea seemed logical why not go through that to discuss it? and not start another thread like it was his big idea...
And Skizo, to answer your question, you shouldn't change it. "The WIAW is for traders and traders trade accounts." That is exactly what I was told about my levels.
However, if you want to see some levels based on invites you can go search and hopefully find my thread... just like other people who want that have been doing..
Fact of the matter is, you combine the two systems. You have to go one way or the other..
And both ways have been mapped out already... :idunno:
I also just want to point out that I don't mean any disrespect by my posts. I'm not trying to offend you or cause problems, I'm merely stating my opinion.
On my list countries that have banned most/all foreign IPs are unlisted since their rarity is only relevant to people in those countries. Just FYI ;) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Enlightened
Because getting blackcats or pisexy is mutch easier than getting e***** and even if you get them all the chances not to be disabled at e***** are quite low. Thats why its level should be on top, cause it is very hard to get there.
Lets take fo rexample BH - its closed, but there are many people trading their accounts succesfully. The chance to get one account are mutch better than geting e***** account and not so high like getting blackcats... Its about rarity...
more drama.
lets bring all trackers to level 1 and make individual polls on what their levels should be.
whichever number wins, allocate. Community choice, cant refuse and that way skizo , u ll have a lot less work to do.
the site is cluttering with threads that are not necessary anyway, why not allow threads that actually decrease ur work. LOL
good luck, staffing a forum is hard work. Seeing as its a thankless job, I ll thank u for the time u put into the forum.
I don't think that would work. People would vote with such a bias as to which torrent they: 1) Like the most. 2) Have the most invites to. 3) Want to get more attention.Quote:
Originally Posted by p1r4t3
:ghey:Quote:
Originally Posted by civeta
I like the idea. It will be hard work to make so many polls, but it has to be comunity choice indeed.Quote:
Originally Posted by p1r4t3
you just cant kill the current system skizo, U really CANNOT. :-P
Think the thread is right security wise,as far as i know9which is not much @ all).:)
community based poll wont really work as it will be biased. Grind was on the right lines of simplfying it into invites only trackers, as monitoring both invites and account trading requires somone to be monitoring the wiaw thread on a regular basis and make a few assumptions along the way.
What's the point of that thread?
The WIAW have been having that name since it was first posted and it used to provide agreat source of info about trackers along with their availability whether accs or invites and it has been widely known and famous with that name but now after like 1.5-2 years you just remembered that the name isn't suitable ,TBH this is ridiculous
if you wanna thread where TL&FL is lvl 10 then why don't you use Grind$one which has that and add it to the current What Trackers are Worth thread in the main section but in WIAW you are discussing availablity so putting FL in lvl 10 because it have no invites is pure stupidity for the WIAW because 1 of many WIAW purposes is to reflect the current market status and even if u moved FTN to lvl 1 or BCG to lvl 10 ,it won't change the facts that BCG can be easily got than FTN although both don't have invite system
btw move Czone to lvl 1 ,it's open signups
Why not just get rid of the levels completely? Just keep the trackers + their reviews. Basically let the market dictate their level (worth).
Going by the current system if someone wants to trade a level 10 for a 5 so be it. Without the levels the users would themselves decide what they want for it or what it is worth to them.