I thought I already said I give out IPs:unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by ca_aok
Printable View
I thought I already said I give out IPs:unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by ca_aok
Shh, don't tell the traders that ;)
Ca-aok go donate to what.cd some more, and kiss some more ass to maintain your vip status.
Touché, your making the same terrible pro-what.cd posts as usual.Quote:
The entire point of this thread was to parody the terrible posts made by folks like you
Me too! Guess we are just in the lucky 120,000 members. :01:Quote:
Originally Posted by IdolEyes787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tv Controls you
If it's any consolation I hate him too ,donating and uploading stuff so that the rest of us reap the benefits of his insincerity.
Just picture for a moment if there was more motherfuckers like him on the net insidiously supporting stuff . I need to punch the wall just thinking about it.:crazy:
Edit.I think I may have just broken my hand,remind me to come up with a less violent way to vent my hostility next time.:stars:
I hope you know that my pain is all on you ca_aok:angry::angry:
Yes the same website thatQuote:
If it's any consolation I hate him too ,donating and uploading stuff so that the rest of us reap the benefits of his insincerity.
reapedraped the benefits I provided to waffles.fm.
He supports an uptight community of hypocritical elitist who believe they can treat members like shit.
I pirate to fight those same assholes who think they can walk over the everyday person.
It's truly out of my support for filesharing that I oppose what.cd. (ponder that one for a bit lol)
Nobody hates the type of "better than thou" attitude present on some sites than I do but I have never been personally witness to it on What.
I am not saying that it hasn't or doesn't exist ,just that I have never seen any evidence of it .
I have seen though ,at least in my perception, that Whatman and other staff have been exceedingly fair with people here.
Like I said that is just my personal opinion as the opposite is yours.
Well actually they have been very unfair towards every single non-cheating Azureus/Vuze user, to the point where they used their shier size toinfectpersuade staff elsewhere to do the same.
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tv Controls you
Taking yourself a bit too seriously, aren't you?
You're a hate blinded fool. Supporting a community that gave someone like you the boot isn't really too difficult based on your attitude. As for Waffles, you brought that on yourself. Not only did you draw attention to your account there, but you were the one who offered to sell their fucking invites. No one forced you to make that post. So you can believe that the evil folks at What lost you your Waffles account, but it was 100% your fault.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tv Controls you
By the way, your logic is idiotic, comparing some moral stand against the RIAA/MPAA (which is usually just a bullshit excuse for "I want this stuff for free") to your whiny emo bitchfest of a post record in these threads is irrelevant and sad.
I'm just a terrible person, I know :(Quote:
Originally Posted by IdolEyes787Quote:
Originally Posted by Tv Controls you
If it's any consolation I hate him too ,donating and uploading stuff so that the rest of us reap the benefits of his insincerity.
Just picture for a moment if there was more motherfuckers like him on the net insidiously supporting stuff . I need to punch the wall just thinking about it.:crazy:
Edit.I think I may have just broken my hand,remind me to come up with a less violent way to vent my hostility next time.:stars:
I hope you know that my pain is all on you ca_aok:angry::angry:
You don't exactly need to kiss ass to get promoted to VIP by the way. Start by not selling invites and not multiaccounting, and work from there. Cute that you went and looked up my profile though :D
Where exactly did that happen? Aside from What/Waffles which was a joint decision, the only site I saw that banned it was PTP. And given the recent oh so fun accusations against them, one would think it'd be a place to avoid...Quote:
Well actually they have been very unfair towards every single non-cheating Azureus/Vuze user, to the point where they used their shier size to infect persuade staff elsewhere to do the same.
:yup:Quote:
Taking yourself a bit too seriously, aren't you?
It's all a conspiracy I tell you :yes:
It's not something out in the open, but it's a fact that quite a lot of people understand quite clearly. The day a tracker as huge as What decides to do something, especially pertaining to their decisions of banning clients, it's not quite the same thing as if (let's say) BrokenStones did it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ca_aok
One is a small, dedicated tracker that has little to no influence on the general community, while the other is a tracker where members archive whole collections in their client. Members would be more inclined to follow What's decisions, even when it comes to upgrading their clients. Even if it's not apparent, if it wasn't for What's decision, a lot of trackers could have (hypothetically) banned uTorrent 1.82-5, because those aren't perfect either, but rather, what we actually see, are trackers accommodating for 2.0 and other releases, at the same time.
If it's any consolation I did try to have them overturn the Vuze ban :pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by Night0wl
But the fact is aside from PTP we haven't seen any sites that specifically banned Vuze in a domino effect. While some sites make allowances for uT 2.0, others do not. And 1.8.2 and 1.8.5 work ok, it was .3 and .4 that were quite buggy. The only real reason most people didn't want to upgrade from 1.7.7 is because you can no longer force hammer the tracker ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ringhunter
That pisses me off quite a bit, to this day.Quote:
Originally Posted by ca_aok
At any rate, my driving point was What's decision still influenced other trackers. Some trackers would have gladly adopted 2.0 or the 2.1beta as the sole acceptable clients, had it not been for the need and knowledge that their users would be none too happy with running two clients.
Also, is uT1.6.1 still globally accepted?
Thanks for pointing out the mistake we did not make, IdolEyes787. We looked into the reason you were not disabled and found out that it was indeed not for no reason, and it was completely not our fault, so on behalf of what.cd staff, I do not apologize. You are not re-enabled, and you may never log in. No thanks!
Nah, the only tracker I've seen that even discussed this was Pedros, and I and a few others managed to talk them down to keeping the latest build of 1.8.5 allowable.Quote:
At any rate, my driving point was What's decision still influenced other trackers. Some trackers would have gladly adopted 2.0 or the 2.1beta as the sole acceptable clients, had it not been for the need and knowledge that their users would be none too happy with running two clients.
I wouldn't say globally. It's still whitelisted in some places but not everywhere.Quote:
Also, is uT1.6.1 still globally accepted?
This thread makes me lose faith in humanity. lol....
I am going on a business trip for a week and will be back this Sunday...
I know all you what.cd lovers will miss me :P
The rest of us who aren't delusional will see you when you get back :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tv Controls you
My faith in humanity, however, remains steadfast. My faith in our public school system is tested on a daily basis though...
And they all did not live happily ever after.Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofjesus
Ahh it seems as if we do agree on atleast one subject... :)Quote:
My faith in our public school system is tested on a daily basis though...
May you have an unfortunate yachting accident :whistlingQuote:
Originally Posted by Tv Controls you
anyways it has disabled you
bitch
they disabled me today....and if you guys have same problem like this
No mather what, do not be honest.Quote:
Your account has been disabled.
This is either due to inactivity or rule violation.
To discuss this come to our IRC at: irc.what-network.net
And join #what.cd-disabled
Be honest - at this point, lying will get you nowhere.
See, when you're not a dirty trader the honesty thing isn't as big of a problem :whistlingQuote:
Originally Posted by zonta
Even better, convince yourself of doing what they think you've done and act accordingly.Quote:
Originally Posted by zonta
Note that it does *not* say "If you are honest, we will re-enable you." I can assure you, though, that if we know that you are lying, you will positively not be re-enabled. Honesty only helps your case, but it doesn't guarantee that you'll get off scot-free. I can name many traders who have had their accounts re-enabled due to their honesty. I can also name many users who lost their accounts on even smaller infractions because they refused to tell the truth.
funny i said true but im still banned because of my inviter.
Zonta. You are offering to trade what.cd here:
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/f-bit...de-list-402762
And you are saying you don't deserve to be disabled? There's no room for argument here.
http://static.funnyjunk.com/pictures...-bunny-cry.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by sickofjesus
Looks like he just edited What out :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofjesus
poor zonta, the damage is already done, there's no point in hiding your trades attempts.
Yes, otherwise it would be a scam, given he no longer has it.Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbiLooks like he just edited What out :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofjesus
ofcourse i edited my post .. im not hidden something i dont have any longer what.cd what should i do????
:pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by yj41
yj41 - posts 20 ! DUH !!Quote:
Originally Posted by anon-sbi:pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by yj41
My point. :dabs:
thought the praying part was enough of a point..
wtf?!
Hey there
I have been disabled from what-cd due Inactivity due to my computer being fixed and so has been action for a few weeks.
Is there anyway I can get back on my user name Is nealjan.
Many thanks
Follow the tip the the "your account has been disabled" message gives you, namely joining IRC.