Permission to Post

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

also this
Attachment 92956

---

Noice to the max and back again. Woo hoo!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

He reminds me of a con I used to have, a little fat and bald middle aged bloke who torched his house cause he got in a huff with his wife or something or other. He basically spent most days writing (mostly letters full of hatred to the by then ex-wife, despite the fact that they'd never be posted as he wasn't allowed contact) and whining about women to anyone who'd listen to him. He cried a lot too...he generally got on my tits.

edit: I made him cry and smash up once when I insisted he took a poster down as it was in an unauthourised place in his cell. It was most amusing, true story.

---

You should do more true jail stories to the max.

---

Most of it would involve drinking tea and playing pool, like.
Tho' the bloke what tried to "escape" everyday would be worth a chapter of his own. He'd come down to the gate every morning, prop bag over his shoulder and try to convince whoever was on the gate that he was due for release. Every day, without fail.
The best part was that he seemed to be a bit menthol and genuinely got angry with us when we laughed and wouldn't let him leave. He'd loiter near the gate while moves went off then try to sneak past again when he thought nobody was looking.
Had to put him on his arse once for it, like, cause I stuck my arm out across the open gate so he couldn't pass and he walked into my arm, that there was an assault on me.

Also placing an open tin of mackerel on the heating pipes in a particular "mischevious little scamp"'s cell then closing the door while he was out at court for the day was worth much luls. He was alright that one, found it funny when he came back after being sentenced.

There was this scabby fucking toerag from Ballymena (worst hole in NI) on my wing. He was about two steps down from a fucking dung beetle. Smelled like it too.

Somebody, having finished with the newspaper, hollered down the wing, 'Does anybody want this?'

Ballymena bounded out of cell screaming, 'Give it to me!! What is it?!?'

Laugh? I nearly shat.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

I'm not the one stalking the only female in the lounge, though, making general derisory statements about women just cos you know she'll read them. That's pretty fucking sad, mate.

Ever considered chemical castration? I've heard it works wonders for perverts like you.

---

We've done that crap, have you no new false accusations to level at me? Or are we to be stuck in this loop of you making the same old false accusations over and over and over... you're starting to bore me, and I suspect everyone else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

I'm not the one stalking the only female in the lounge, though, making general derisory statements about women just cos you know she'll read them. That's pretty fucking sad, mate.

Ever considered chemical castration? I've heard it works wonders for perverts like you.

---

We've done that crap, have you no new false accusations to level at me? Or are we to be stuck in this loop of you making the same old false accusations over and over and over... you're starting to bore me, and I suspect everyone else.

---

If the accusations were false, I would've stopped by now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

There was this scabby fucking toerag from Ballymena (worst hole in NI) on my wing. He was about two steps down from a fucking dung beetle. Smelled like it too.

Somebody, having finished with the newspaper, hollered down the wing, 'Does anybody want this?'

Ballymena bounded out of cell screaming, 'Give it to me!! What is it?!?'

Laugh? I nearly shat.

---

:lol: :earl:
had one very similar, he'd also go round scanning the ground looking for tab ends to collect to get the tiny amount of precious baccy out of them.
The other cons all called him "Jesus", why? Not because he had some profound ideas or taught them shit, but instead because he had scraggly long hair and beard. Genious bunch, like.
He did used to get little gifts of roll-on deodorant and shower gel left outside his door every morning, like, cause he fucking hummed.

edit: not from me, like, my guess was it was his neighbours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

He reminds me of a con I used to have, a little fat and bald middle aged bloke who torched his house cause he got in a huff with his wife or something or other. He basically spent most days writing (mostly letters full of hatred to the by then ex-wife, despite the fact that they'd never be posted as he wasn't allowed contact) and whining about women to anyone who'd listen to him. He cried a lot too...he generally got on my tits.

edit: I made him cry and smash up once when I insisted he took a poster down as it was in an unauthourised place in his cell. It was most amusing, true story.

---

Whereas you just look like yet another mate of chavis to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

If the accusations were false, I would've stopped by now.

---

Boring!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

He reminds me of a con I used to have, a little fat and bald middle aged bloke who torched his house cause he got in a huff with his wife or something or other. He basically spent most days writing (mostly letters full of hatred to the by then ex-wife, despite the fact that they'd never be posted as he wasn't allowed contact) and whining about women to anyone who'd listen to him. He cried a lot too...he generally got on my tits.

edit: I made him cry and smash up once when I insisted he took a poster down as it was in an unauthourised place in his cell. It was most amusing, true story.

---

Whereas you just look like yet another mate of chavis to me.

---

It's incredible how you could draw such a conclusion based on the logic that I find you banal and am therefore a "mate of chavis".

By your logic, chavis must be more popular than Friendly McLotsofmates, like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

It's incredible how you could draw such a conclusion based on the logic that I find you banal and am therefore a "mate of chavis".

---

What a weird line of thought. My 'conclusion' was based upon the discussion you're having with him on this very thread. Again I'm not sure why I'm meant to give any kind of fuck what you think about me. I do however reserve the right to make statements about what I see in you, in resonse to you making statements about what you see in me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

It's incredible how you could draw such a conclusion based on the logic that I find you banal and am therefore a "mate of chavis".

---

What a weird line of thought. My 'conclusion' was based upon the discussion you're having with him on this very thread. Again I'm not sure why I'm meant to give any kind of fuck what you think about me. I do however reserve the right to make statements about what I see in you, in resonse to you making statements about what you see in me.

---

I never said you didn't have a right to make whatever statements you wish, you're free to continue being scrolled past by most and long may that continue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

I never said you didn't have a right to make whatever statements you wish, you're free to continue being scrolled past by most and long may that continue.

---

I wonder what it is about chavis that makes people behave as they do towards him? You know like you just did.

1) There you are having a nice matey chat with him, about past events and about things that have passed between you in the past.
2) He makes a remark about me, and I respond.
3) You join in and take a swipe at me.
4) I point out that you're just another mate of chavis.

5) You deny it.

Why do people deny it? Is it that shameful? Or at least thought of as something you don't want to be? Cause that's how it comes across. Oh! And you're not the first member who has denied it.

Jebus. I think it's time you took the rage-tinted spectacles off. That post was quite ridiculous.

Bo merely pointed out that your conclusion that he's chavis' mate using the logic that you did was quite a leap. He didn't type that he isn't chavis' mate, probably cus he is.
Absence of affirmation does not constitute denial.


I think you're getting mixed up so I'll attempt to clarify; people are taking swipes at you not because of any allegiance to chavis, but because of the words you type.

:spam::spam::spam::spam:
:spam::spam::spam::spam::spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam::spam::spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:
:spam:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

also this
Attachment 92962

---

I remember when Barbie made that.
A shame he's not allowed on the internets any more. He was decent at phoatieshawp, that chap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Jebus. I think it's time you took the rage-tinted spectacles off. That post was quite ridiculous.

Bo merely pointed out that your conclusion that he's chavis' mate using the logic that you did was quite a leap. He didn't type that he isn't chavis' mate, probably cus he is.
Absence of affirmation does not constitute denial.


I think you're getting mixed up so I'll attempt to clarify; people are taking swipes at you not because of any allegiance to chavis, but because of the words you type.

---

No I think you missed the point entirely.

More than one member here as responded to a post of mine pointing out that they're a mate of chavis, by immediately responding defensively.

Now what is this logic which you claimed I used to leap to an unfounded conclusion?

I stated what I did because the posts they made prove the conclusion I posted. The response to that conclusion was defensive, and negative.

As for people taking swipes at me, as I keep pointing out, I couldn't care less. I never came here to make friends, I came here to return to chavis that which he so willing dishes out to others. I don't care if any of you like me, I don't care what any of you think about my opinions about anything, I don't care if any of you like or dislike my posts.

"I don't care"

Yeah.
The defensive reaction is precisely because they're taking a swipe because you posted some words and not because they're chavis' mate because the implication in your post(s) is that Bo (or whoever) would only take a swipe at you to suck up to chavis, which is obviously going to elicit a defensive response when it isn't the case.

You just said that your point was that people responded defensively - which is true, they do. You also made the point that people, in this case Bo, denied being his mate. Which is false (certainly in this case). It was number 5 in your list of points.
I disputed this.

So far from me missing that point. I read it, comprehended it, and successfully rebutted it.
Bo didn't deny he was chavis' mate.

I also wanted to help you understand why the swiping happens, hence the extra words.




Fuck's sake. explaining stuff in detail is such a chore. Was my original post really so impenetrable :dabs:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Yeah.
The defensive reaction is precisely because they're taking a swipe because you posted some words and not because they're chavis' mate because the implication in your post(s) is that Bo (or whoever) would only take a swipe at you to suck up to chavis, which is obviously going to elicit a defensive response when it isn't the case.

You just said that your point was that people responded defensively - which is true, they do. You also made the point that people, in this case Bo, denied being his mate. Which is false (certainly in this case). It was number 5 in your list of points.
I disputed this.

So far from me missing that point. I read it, comprehended it, and successfully rebutted it.
Bo didn't deny he was chavis' mate.

I also wanted to help you understand why the swiping happens, hence the extra words.




Fuck's sake. explaining stuff in detail is such a chore. Was my original post really so impenetrable :dabs:

---

FFS! It's really simple honest.

Bo (as you call him) posted nasty remarks about me to chavis.
He then objected to me making an observation about him being a mate of chavis.

I said nothing to him. I made a perfectly reasonable observation about him (based upon the evidence of this thread) which happily explains why his opinion is of fuck all consequence to me.

I haven't called him any names.
I haven't attacked him in anyway.

It was he who went off on one when I merely stated a fact. If he wants to read shit into posts which I never said, that's his problem. I didn't engage with him, I only exercised my right to comment upon someone who commented upon me.

I then noted that it's a common pattern, that more than one member here has exhibited, when I have pointed out that they're a friend/mate of chavis. This defensiveness, that is thrown back at me... and no matter how you try to paint it, that's what it clearly is. Like being a mate of chavis is something they don't like me pointing out.

Dude. it was the 'denial' part I'm disputing.

He didn't deny it.

sorry for the busy edit:

all the rest of your post was ok. this was the bit i found to be inaccurate.
I found it inaccurate because it's inaccurate. I then went on to explain why it's inaccurate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reject

5) You deny it.

Why do people deny it? Is it that shameful? Or at least thought of as something you don't want to be? Cause that's how it comes across. Oh! And you're not the first member who has denied it.

---

You're taking the denial thing to far, I never said he'd said he wasn't a mate of chavis. I only pointed out that his defensive reaction to my simple and reasonable statement was defensive and thus denialist.

The statement I made wasn't offensive to Bo (your name).

And that casts his response to that statement in an interesting light.

EDIT:I'm afraid you'll have to excuse me now, I have a woman who I have to go and flatter, in order to use her in the near future. Have a good night.

"I don't care"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

You're taking the denial thing to far, I never said he'd said he wasn't a mate of chavis.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah (to Bo)

4) I point out that you're just another mate of chavis.

5) You deny it.

---

:lol:

Reject, it is simple, really. (I'll make it a 5 part'er since you like bullet points...)

1. If you are going to wander around in a short little skirt, and shout, "Rape me!", it is likely you will have more than one join in on the fun.
2. Reread #1.
3. Reread #1.
4. Reread #1.
5. Reread #1.

Reread this from time to time when you get uncertain on how The Lounge works.

Yeah.
It wouldn't be the first time I've stirred chavis' forumular custard :smilie4:

:lol:

Fithy metaphor, if ever I read one. True though. I'm sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Yeah.
It wouldn't be the first time I've stirred chavis' forumular custard :smilie4:

---

I put that down as a learning experience. A valuable one I'm grateful for. Made me the sterling fellow I am today. I try to help reject out like that and look at the thanks I get. I'll miss him when he gets arrested.

And you're all my mates, youse bunch of cunts. Every last one of you. Whether you are or not. Bless all your little cotton socks.

It's like an endless circle though, innit.

Bunch of mates post pish on the internets. Some chap who isn't overly blessed with social gifts pops along and takes great offence that the bunch of mates are ... a bunch of mates. Socially awkward chap takes a me-against-the-world stance.
Cue tears about internets gang-rape.

Embittered lone-wolf stalks off into the distance, never to be heard of again. And not a single fuck was given.

Billy Dean, Yogi, Bazzymore, Hypo, ziggy, ... Seedler, JP, CrabGirl ... .
k i'm struggling now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Reject, it is simple, really. (I'll make it a 5 part'er since you like bullet points...)

1. If you are going to wander around in a short little skirt, and shout, "Rape me!", it is likely you will have more than one join in on the fun.
2. Reread #1.
3. Reread #1.
4. Reread #1.
5. Reread #1.

Reread this from time to time when you get uncertain on how The Lounge works.

---

You need to explain that to chavis, I fully understand that this place is about raping the fuck out of people... chavis taught me that. Yet he doesn't seem to understand it himself, and so he merrily wanders around getting all defensive and screaming "racist" when I point out a simple fact about child murdering Irish scum, or falsely accusing me of stalking a female when it must be clear by now, that I don't and won't talk to any women on this board... cause I'm here to poke him with my pointy stick. Whilst you're at it, you might like to point it out to his mates, cause Bo (mankers name for him) didn't seem to get it earlier when I passed a perfectly innocent comment about him being a mate of chavis.

It's not me whinging about the cunts calling me names, and taking swipes at me. They're just a bunch of fucking whinging cunts who whine and get all defensive when I return their swipes... it's like they can't take being abused in the manner they so merrily abuse others in.

Anyway, when/if you catch me whining about one of them calling me a name, feel free to point out the blatently obvious again, and I'll assume you'll make sure to point the blatently obvious out to them when they next whine about me posting something about them...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Cue tears about internets gang-rape.

---

Que lies about it being the 'chap' who is whining about name calling... when in reality it's you tossers who don't like said chap returning your nasty shit to you.

I think you summed it up quite well in post #58, because of the amount of times you repeated the phrase " I don't care" which makes you sound as if you really do care.

If you really didn't care you wouldn't be paying any attention to those things you obviously care about.

Not caring is easy, just don't reply and let the thread die.

Trying to get the last word doesn't make the reason you're pissed off any clearer to me than you've already made it in post #58 or whatever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Reject, it is simple, really. (I'll make it a 5 part'er since you like bullet points...)

1. If you are going to wander around in a short little skirt, and shout, "Rape me!", it is likely you will have more than one join in on the fun.
2. Reread #1.
3. Reread #1.
4. Reread #1.
5. Reread #1.

Reread this from time to time when you get uncertain on how The Lounge works.

---

You need to explain that to chavis, I fully understand that this place is about raping the fuck out of people... chavis taught me that. Yet he doesn't seem to understand it himself, and so he merrily wanders around getting all defensive and screaming "racist" when I point out a simple fact about child murdering Irish scum, or falsely accusing me of stalking a female when it must be clear by now, that I don't and won't talk to any women on this board... cause I'm here to poke him with my pointy stick. Whilst you're at it, you might like to point it out to his mates, cause Bo (mankers name for him) didn't seem to get it earlier when I passed a perfectly innocent comment about him being a mate of chavis.

It's not me whinging about the cunts calling me names, and taking swipes at me. They're just a bunch of fucking whinging cunts who whine and get all defensive when I return their swipes... it's like they can't take being abused in the manner they so merrily abuse others in.

Anyway, when/if you catch me whining about one of them calling me a name, feel free to point out the blatently obvious again, and I'll assume you'll make sure to point the blatently obvious out to them when they next whine about me posting something about them...

---

Thanks, Reject. I can only assume the above post is meant as satire (and perfectly played, I might point out) for Manker's post where he says:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

It's like an endless circle though, innit.

Bunch of mates post pish on the internets. Some chap who isn't overly blessed with social gifts pops along and takes great offence that the bunch of mates are ... a bunch of mates. Socially awkward chap takes a me-against-the-world stance.
Cue tears about internets gang-rape.

---

It seems we're all just playing the straight man in your comedy routine. Bastard.

A long ass comedy routine

TBH I'm really not quite sure what it is you've all got your knickers in a twist about. I'll do you a list...

1) Bo takes a dig at me.
2) I take a dig at Bo.

3) You all start telling me I'm not allowed to do that... which was never going to wash.

If you don't like that, I don't care.

Lying about how I'm whinging about Bo taking a dig at me just doesn't hold upto the content of the posts I made.

If you don't want me to poke you with a pointy stick, don't go randomly out of the blue poking me with a pointy stick. I may just poke you back, and having your mates come and tell me I'm not allowed too... that's not going to work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mbm

Thanks, Reject. I can only assume the above post is meant as satire (and perfectly played, I might point out) for Manker's post ...

---

You know, I was reading that post and wondering if someone further down the thread was going to accuse me of slipping into my reject sock-puppet to eulogise my earlier words
My only defence would have been that I couldn't possibly have contrived a monologue that so beautifully dovetailed with my earlier depiction.

This part:
'They're just a bunch of fucking whinging cunts who whine and get all defensive when I return their swipes... it's like they can't take being abused in the manner they so merrily abuse others in.'
Absolute gold.


I mean, this display of genuflecting sycophancy can only be aimed at ingratiating himself with the socially adept here. It's worked to the max but I think he deserves more.
I, for one, hope that he finally gets the girl he's been stalking on here. That she takes the smallest bit of notice of all the angsty grandstanding.

If you're reading, Skweeky, Give him another chance. He's a changed man :smilie4:

The amount of collaboration you and Reject must have spent to sync that up is mind-numbing.

Don't think for a minute that I didn't enjoy it to the fullest, but you guys have been working too hard. :mellow:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

TBH I'm really not quite sure what it is you've all got your knickers in a twist about. I'll do you a list...

1) Bo takes a dig at me.
2) I take a dig at Bo.

3) You all start telling me I'm not allowed to do that... which was never going to wash.

If you don't like that, I don't care.

Lying about how I'm whinging about Bo taking a dig at me just doesn't hold upto the content of the posts I made.

If you don't want me to poke you with a pointy stick, don't go randomly out of the blue poking me with a pointy stick. I may just poke you back, and having your mates come and tell me I'm not allowed too... that's not going to work.

---

Why not?