-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
Your proposed theory smells.
My advice is compliant with something that's had a 100% success rate in a brazillion trials over the last, idk, quarter century or so.
Will have 0 % success rate if I type you're instead of your...
mind visuals won't help my fingers, I type faster than I can picture the words in my head.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
Topic's get'n pwnd! :whistling
As I have patiently tried to explain, analprobeboi, we don't understand what the topic is, because you haven't managed to structure a coherent sentence about your subject.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
He's going to start arguing about what is filesharing and what isn't.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Your proposed theory smells.
My advice is compliant with something that's had a 100% success rate in a brazillion trials over the last, idk, quarter century or so.
Will have 0 % success rate if I type you're instead of your...
mind visuals won't help my fingers, I type faster than I can picture the words in my head.
Unless the grey matter within your spinal column dictates the formulation of your prose, which might explain much come to think about it, I can't see how that could be possible.
Can't you just type a little slower :idunno:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I can't see how that could be possible.
Can't you just type a little slower :idunno:
Using you're method
Scenario 1: Wants to type something that sounds like your, possibles are your and you're
Scenario 2: Wants to type something that sounds like you are, possibles are you are, shorten to you're
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I wasn't done but had to post that, you see what the fuck I did there. Seriously, I mistyped it while composing a post about it!
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
The final part was this:
The only reason any of my posts manage to come across as a coherent message is because of heavy editing.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Drunken drivers have a tendency to yaw all over the road.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
I wasn't done but had to post that, you see what the fuck I did there. Seriously, I mistyped it while composing a post about it!
In the post you replied to, I wrote 'dictates the your formulation'.
If there is a message here, it's that the omniscient grammar gods don't want to fix you.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
The final part was this:
The only reason any of my posts manage to come across as a coherent message is because of heavy editing.
Just how fat is your editor? :blink:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
The final part was this:
The only reason any of my posts manage to come across as a coherent message is because of heavy editing.
Just how fat is your editor? :blink:
That makes you the second person on this board to insinuate that I'm fat.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
I wasn't done but had to post that, you see what the fuck I did there. Seriously, I mistyped it while composing a post about it!
In the post you replied to, I wrote 'dictates the your formulation'.
If there is a message here, it's that the omniscient grammar gods don't want to fix you.
Why'd you fix it? I didn't really read all of it, sorry :(
Like, I read the whole thing, but the only part I actually took in was the part I quoted. My head was somewhere else for the rest.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
I don't actually use my right baby small for you're. I use ruby ring. Weird.
Anyway, I don't know how anyone gets it wrong. Perhaps if you started to say you are instead of you're in your mind when you are thinking stuff and eventually you'll train your mind to separate the two when you're writing.
Fuck your PhD, this is important stuffs.
You're not fully QWERTY compliant then. Also, your advice goes counter to my proposed theory.
By any chance, do you have six fingers on your right hand, manker? :lookaroun
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Barbarossa
Drunken drivers have a tendency to yaw all over the road.
:happy::lol:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Here comes J-dye to show how it's done.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
Just how fat is your editor? :blink:
That makes you the second person on this board to insinuate that I'm fat.
If you read the six words above carefully again you will grasp that I was insinuating that you have in your employ an overweight person to edit your poasts, of indeterminate age/sex/race/religion/body type/BMI & charisma. Since they are completely fictional you can fill in the blanks yourself I will even provide you with some crayons. :blink:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Has anyone considered the posibility that we are just witnessing the new, completely forum-fried Dave in action? He's floating around all pre-med, and all...
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
That makes you the second person on this board to insinuate that I'm fat.
If you read the six words above carefully again you will grasp that I was insinuating that you have in your employ an overweight person to edit your poasts, of indeterminate age/sex/race/religion/body type/BMI & charisma. Since they are completely fictional you can fill in the blanks yourself I will even provide you with some crayons. :blink:
Don't backstep I know you know I am my own editor
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
If you read the six words above carefully again you will grasp that I was insinuating that you have in your employ an overweight person to edit your poasts, of indeterminate age/sex/race/religion/body type/BMI & charisma. Since they are completely fictional you can fill in the blanks yourself I will even provide you with some crayons. :blink:
Don't backstep I know you know I am my own editor
How do you know I know you are your own very bad editor?
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Don't backstep I know you know I am my own editor
How do you know I know you are your own
very bad editor?
like any decent human being would let some of this shit pass through
I'm saying editors are decent human beings.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
like any decent human being would let some of this shit pass through
I'm saying editors are decent human beings.
I would let it pass. Oh wait, I'm starting to see your point...
:sadwalk:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Artemis
Just how fat is your editor? :blink:
That makes you the second person on this board to insinuate that I'm fat.
In the pics I've seen, you do look like you could stand to miss a meal or two.
Per day.
I didn't say anything, though, because I'm not uber-harsh like Squeams and Arty.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
That makes you the second person on this board to insinuate that I'm fat.
In the pics I've seen, you do look like you could stand to miss a meal or two.
Per day.
I didn't say anything, though, because I'm not uber-harsh like Squeams and Arty.
Alright, here we go, here's my big moment.
I'm halfway between Lee Adama during Caprica invasion and Lee Adama during New Caprica invasion.
And that's totally cool with me :yes:
:bow:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
The fact that Lee Adama is 5'3" and you're 5'9" makes your current position in the Weight-Watchers plan to a slimmer waistline and a healthier heart rather less impressive.
How many weeks in are you, did you get your 10lbs badge yet.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
What's Weight-Watchers? Is Dave a member?
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
There are a few dietary money collecting organisations that shame housewives into losing weight.
I used that one cus of the intuitive name. I should have known that it would make you think of our owly chum.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
I've skim-read through this fred and decided that it's silly and I won't be participating in it :snooty:
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Squeamous
I've skim-read through this fred and decided that it's silly and I won't be participating in it :snooty:
'Salright, you aren't here often enough to talk about J-dye.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Squeamous
I've skim-read through this fred and decided that it's silly and I won't be participating in it :snooty:
'Salright, you aren't here often enough to talk about J-dye.
Whatever happened to J-Dye?
A bit of a spammer true but not the worst cereal offender we have had
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Biggles
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
'Salright, you aren't here often enough to talk about J-dye.
Whatever happened to J-Dye?
A bit of a spammer true but not the worst cereal offender we have had
He's still around but the lounge mod is under strict instruction to delete his posts and ban him upon sight. Apparently the self-same lounge mod is around quite a bit which spells bad news for our Indian chum.
:(
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
The World is Black .The World is White . So just beat it Billie Jean.
Bit late but yeh i think that could be the subliminal/sublingual message inside the human message. We could be communicating with the dead here.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
The World is Black .The World is White . So just beat it Billie Jean.
Bit late but yeh i think that could be the subliminal/sublingual message inside the human message. We could be communicating with the dead here.
I'm communicating with the braindead right now in fact.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
Bit late but yeh i think that could be the subliminal/sublingual message inside the human message. We could be communicating with the dead here.
I'm communicating with the braindead right now in fact.
What's he saying, Idol? Obviously you were given a curse gift few mortals possess... :O
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megabyteme
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
I'm communicating with the braindead right now in fact.
What's he saying, Idol? Obviously you were given a
curse gift few mortals possess... :O
Upon adopting his dietary choice, Idol has gained special abilities.
He is the vegetable whisperer.
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Quote:
Originally Posted by
megabyteme
What's he saying, Idol? Obviously you were given a curse gift few mortals possess... :O
Upon adopting his dietary choice, Idol has gained special abilities.
He is the vegetable whisperer.
"Rise, my m'onions. Rise!"
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
-
Re: Child not pornogorgraphy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IdolEyes787
Quote:
Originally Posted by
junglebook
Bit late but yeh i think that could be the subliminal/sublingual message inside the human message. We could be communicating with the dead here.
I'm communicating with the braindead right now in fact.
Well as a fact not in a fact im going to make this response braindeadly factless.