Gravity Movie - What You Think?

Clearly movies are real and you have no idea what you are talking about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

Clearly movies are real and you have no idea what you are talking about.

---

In all seriousness one of the questions asked the director of Gravity was "what were the technical difficulties of filming in space?" by a mexican reporter. :stuart:

I fast forwarded through most of it, only a couple of characters in the film made it boring and lacked atmosphere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by samplehunters

I fast forwarded through most of it, only a couple of characters in the film made it boring and lacked atmosphere.

---

:mellow:

I felt it was a slow film and with the 'small' number of characters, it was difficult to find any depth in the film, especially when most good films have multiple plots that merge into one giant story. I can see why people like it and respect the film makers who produced it as it is not something everyone would enjoy.

Not for me, but hey, that's just my opinion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jaybow

I felt it was a slow film and with the 'small' number of characters, it was difficult to find any depth in the film, especially when most good films have multiple plots that merge into one giant story

---

Actually that's not true and majority of the movies considered to be great tend to have a focused vision.What you are describing is a particular genre of film which once upon a time was called a spectacle.
Also for the record, a spectacle is usually bereft of real depth.

the movie was visually great but from my point of view, the actors wasn't so good. Moreover, George Clooney is...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnFinch

Moreover, George Clooney is...

---

Don't leave me hanging like so many ideas of marriage and settling down.

Saw the movie and thought it was OK. Guess the engineer/scientist in me was thinking too much about how things would not actually work as shown in the film.

The movie was more of a visual spectacle than a deep meaningful story. Sure, there is some raw human emotion, but it paled relative to the 3D effects.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterTedster

The movie was more of a visual spectacle than a deep meaningful story. Sure, there is some raw human emotion, but it paled relative to the 3D effects.

---

Hard for 1-dimensional characters to compete with 3-dimensional explosions.

The movie did not keep me interested. Slow....yes but just something about it.

I love Sandra but, this could be one of the worst scripts she chose to do.

Biggest pile of sh## I've had sit and watch
I want the time back
Very poor indeed

You have to watch it in theaters

i was wondering why sandra bullock should get an oscar for this performance?

Watched the 2D and 3D version, 3D is much better and really comes to life. It wasn't a bad movie, it kept me entertained, plus my young children were able to watch it, so it turned into a family event. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jeppreysayz

You have to watch it in theaters

---

hmmm....maybe. that I did not do...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hakzoid

plus my young children were able to watch it, so it turned into a family event.

---

Just like sex, then. :w00t:

Is it just as enjoyable non 3D?

Good at the cinema in 3d, rubbish otherwise

Saw the non 3D version, wasn't that bad.

I enjoyed it ! I now want to spacewalk. looks fun.

I enjoyed it, saw in 3d at the cinema. I don't think it would come across quite the same on the small screen.