Athlon Xp 3000+ Vs. P4 3.06 Ghz

Printable View

04-06-2003, 08:56 PM
Wolfmight

Quote:

Originally posted by Supernatural+24 March 2003 - 03:00--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Supernatural @ 24 March 2003 - 03:00)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--adthomp@24 March 2003 - 00:28
AMD the best no question about it intel runs okay but to expensive and u cant clock it like amd

I don't know what you're talking about, it's a well known fact that Intel chips have more overclockablilty than the AMD chips. Price is about the same, no huge difference. [/b][/quote]
I thought it was the other way around..
04-06-2003, 10:02 PM
Lamsey

Quote:

Price is about the same, no huge difference.

That's someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.

AMD chips are always cheaper. Reasons:
- AMD use a cheaper manufacturing process
- They undercut Intel prices in order to raise the appeal of their chips
- They don't pay for huge marketing campaigns (i.e. 'Intel Inside' - doo do do doo...)
04-07-2003, 01:53 AM
Wizzandabe

what about a p5 probally go up to about 6ghz like my new comp can take up to that.
04-07-2003, 10:34 AM
Schmiggy_JK23

p5... laugh. Screw intel... buy yourself a Amd Hammer when it comes... gonna blow intel out of the water with full 64bit, and 32 bit support. And its gonna run at a far less speed.