Yes, but that only works in the ethereal world of numbers... Not in your actual physical reality. :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
edit: anyway you shouldn't eat these snacks, Jon. Unless you want teh man boobs back. ;)
Printable View
Yes, but that only works in the ethereal world of numbers... Not in your actual physical reality. :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
edit: anyway you shouldn't eat these snacks, Jon. Unless you want teh man boobs back. ;)
Don't talk daft man. If I've got 100 smarties and someone gives me 8 more then I've got 108% of what I started with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guillaume
Nothing intangible about that.
You're considering the numbers.
You can't increase the percentage of a finished product.
In your smarties example the actual smartie hasn't augmented of 8%
The Answer To All
:01:
Jonno :cool:
In this instance they were comparing the finished product to the starting ingredients, the starting amount of pork was 108% more than the finished article, it is purely a number though just that for informational purposes as required by law :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Guillaume
Of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guillaume
However, you said my example would only work with intangibles, I proved that it would also work with tangibles too.
:huh: You mean 8% more? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
Jonno :cool:
wtf? you've managed to confuse me now :frusty:
OK.
To make a pepperami they started off with 108 grammes of pork and 20 grammes of 'other spicy stuff' - making 128 grammes altogether. - call this stage one.
When they treated this mixture it lost around 28 grammes of water through evaporation, making the final weight 100 grammes. - call this stage two.
Then they put the stuff into the packet - stage three.
So the law requires to express the percentages on the packet in terms of the individual componants in stage one.
So the pork = 108 grammes (stage 1) out of a total of 100 grammes (stage 3) = 108%
oh, i funderstand now, i'm gonna apply for my free pepperami
Here's an idea:ph34r:
its a typo?
More likely just some idiot at the plant playing a prank.
:lol: me too
Thankyou Manker :)
But you must agree it would be less confusing to put "Pork 108g" instead of 108% :frusty:
@Dan .. :lol: You said it would be 108% more, I think you meant 8% more otherwise it would end up 208% :01:
Maths is a beatiful thing, maths is a wonderful thing, so get off your ass and do some maths, math math math math maaaaaaaaaaaath :01:
Jonno :cool:
Yo you crazy:P:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
54 is to 45 more so what is the answer Marthaaaaaa?
Nine
No iiiit'sssss eiiiiiight....
No it's niiiiiiiiine
Yeees I was testing you..IT'S .... Niiiiine
:01:
Jonno :cool:
YOU GOTTAAA SSSSTOP Maaaahn!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
IIIssss Kiiiiillin' meeeh!:crying::lol:
And that's the magic numbeeerrrrrrrrrrrr :01:
*follows thru to next mathamatical song*
THREE!!!..........is teh magic number.......yes it is.....it's the magic number
Jonno :cool:
See, you shouldn't argue with Manker, he knows all about pigs and sheep and things. :blink:
lynx respects my farmyard authoritah!