....and you could tell by the box-office smash of his movie...Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Printable View
....and you could tell by the box-office smash of his movie...Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
But did it get Kerry elected?
No it didn't.
But is that more down to the fact that people are/were blinkered and thought it was all just anti bush blurb?
who's eyebrows were raised ? Mine certainly weren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
why are you so concerned with moore ? even if he presented his film with just the facts with no "dressing" you wouldn't like him because he is anti Bush.
Vid if someone who makes a major motion picture devoted to trashing the sitting president and then is front and center and the opponent’s convention doesn’t bother you than that’s you.
if he made an anti kerry movie and sat next to bush... would that bother you?
A movie that was made to influence the election by using propaganda? Yes.
so was the swift vets "movies". ok they didn't sit next to him at the convention At least moores was "based on facts"...even if presented in a wierd self serving context....Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
what's the difference between a movie and someone that goes out preaching inacurate propaganda about the opponent ?.... look how kerry's record was twisted. Fact is you don't like moore because of his beliefs...but moore wasn't running so he is not relevent to anything.
people that wish to make an informed choice look at the candidate, not who he sits with.
Kerry is good friends with John Mcain...does that make him a republican?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Moore and the word fact in the same sentence :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
You missed the whole point. Bush came out and said that he didn’t like all the 527 ads.
so did kerry...before bush did...bush waited until the ads run was over...:whistlingQuote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
So I guess he really didn't like it then. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
I could understand this argument if Kerry had done badly and gathered in less votes than Gore - but he didn't did he?Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
And without the benefit of scaring the shit out of the citizens with false "Terror Alerts" and fixed Computer Voting machines :lol:
I dont know if Moore did help. All I think he really did is make Bush voters angry, and have idiotic signatures at FT.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Another for Hank
2 days after sept 11th attacks
Bush doesn't distance himself from Jerry does he?Quote:
Jerry Falwell
"I fear... that [September 11th] is only the beginning. ...If, in fact, God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve ... I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle ... all of them who have tried to secularize America -- I point the finger in their face and say `you helped this happen.'"
John kerry is a dreamer and a user (in the bad sense) of taxdollars. The majority of the public knew better than to listen to his incessant rambling. So I guess the only answer to your question is 'NO', he was voted in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Kerry was standing in 2000? :ohmy:
Always answer the set question not the one you think is there. :confused:
I am worried that you seem confused as to who the candidates were ...(guessing you voted Bush :whistling)Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
perhaps a requirement to vote in our future elections should be naming at least two candidates before entering the booth.
But seeing as you mention tax dollars..why is he (Kerry)a bad user of them?
Just how is Bush a good spender ? he has yet to veto a single spending bill and is spending more than he has. Everthing is on the credit card...for later tax payers to pick up the tab.
Any American citizen that runs their household in the way this current government is running the country would find their house being repossessed
:blink:Quote:
Kerry was standing in 2000? :ohmy:
Always answer the set question not the one you think is there. :confused:
Uh...Sorry bro, maybe you're the confused one. I said Bush won the election over John Kerry. He didn't 'steal' it.Quote:
I am worried that you seem confused as to who the candidates were ...(guessing you voted Bush :whistling)
perhaps a requirement to vote in our future elections should be naming at least two candidates before entering the booth.
Anything else I can settle/explain for you?
Read the topic again Skizo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Pay attention to numbers then come back. ;)
so Kerry was running in 2000? :whistlingQuote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Come on vid.Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Ya gotta throw him hints w/o being so obvious.
Let's do our share to fire up other's the brain cells. ;)
:blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Probably best to get your own fired up first, mate ;)
but that wasn't the question.:whistlingQuote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Nobody asked if he stole the election where Kerry was runningQuote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Uh...Sorry bro, maybe you're the confused one. I said Bush won the election over John Kerry. He didn't 'steal' it.
perhaps you could answer the actual question asked by the thread.... oh and the questions i asked you. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Anything else I can settle/explain for you?
Edit: @ Busy...hope your house isn't made of glass :lol:...sorry couldn't resist
Wanker, I'll fire up your the brain cells too. :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Sorry I don't get it. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Really
Fire up your the brain cells. :1eye:
Bet everyone else doesQuote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I knew it :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
:lol:
Jealousy will get you nothing but aQuote:
Originally Posted by manker
"See, I'm laughing at him too" post by
:dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Actually I was just getting my post count up...
:lol:
Damn I didn't think they counted here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Post on man. ;)
How can anyone, who has been the worst president of America in it's whole history, who has lead the economy to the lowest, who has helped so much the rich and who has lost so many jobs, would be re-elected for presidency?
My answer is:
a) All americans are stupid, or all Americans are rich (Needless to say this is wrong)
b) The election had something strange....