Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Sounds like a personal reading problem then. Plenty of people have mild forms of dyslexia without even realising it.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Sounds like a personal reading problem then. Plenty of people have mild forms of dyslexia without even realising it.
Umm...
The rest of the world has larger penises and hotter women ... :naughty:
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbarossa
Are you saying America doesn't have big dicks?
Seems more like selective myopia to me. I'm not sure if your post was read at all, the quote button was clicked and something practically unrelated was posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
You see that's the problem with folks like yourself. If I say American cinema is better it's an opinion (although pretty accurate by how many outside the US watch it and swear by it). If it wasn't that good then many folks should fucking stop watching it. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
Subtitles don't require much thinking. It's reading ffs. I simply pointed out that when your eye is focusing on the bottom of the screen (even if it's not that long), it takes the eye away from the on-screen action. Now in dramas it is not as bad as in a horror or action movie.
I agree with the edumacation part but it's rather simple logic that one's would prefer a movie made in a language they understand (not necessarily dubbed) than one that's written. If you are trying to learn another language (or are deaf) maybe subtitles are great but most people hit the movies to enjoy the entire cinematic experience.
in relation to Mankers last pot(+quote) the usa needs europe for grammar & spelling?
it is a sad day
Oh he must have been asking for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Anyone notice that Americans don't really come on here insulting other's nationalities? :dry:
That's OK well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I didn't see this post before but I agree. I liked Open Your Eyes better yet if it was subtitled but was made, not dubbed, in English, I'd have liked it better.Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
How so?Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
I can read just fine. I would have prefered not to read a movie. It turns out I had no choice and still liked it.
fWt aer yuo no abtou? :blink: Lysdexia?
You got your RealitY check, then.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Is it me or where you (busyman) not posting on this site until the word usa popped up.
The world has
animals
nature
oxygen
photosynthesis
marshmellows (indeed american)
social space
hobos
malakas
women
and so much more
but
why does it feel that the world is smaller than the usa?
A superpower to take the mickey out of.Quote:
What does the rest of the World have that the USA does'nt?
I don't get that feeling at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by 99%
I post in threads that interest me. Interesting threads are hard to come by these days and I don't post in the "chitchat" threads that much. You seem to make some thought provoking threads sometimes versus idle chatter.
Does that answer your question?
No, it proofed too bee unpossible.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Oh, here we go again.
It's all right, as superficial entertainment goes, which is what most of it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Nobody said it was bad, per se, but it isn't excellent either, on average. And really, compared to the rest of the world hollywood churns out a massive amount of movies. The market is full of them, so of course a lot of people watch them. That doesn't mean that american movies are better, it just means that people watch a lot of them as light entertainment in between excellent releases, from wherever.
As far as I'm concerned, the best two movies I ever saw were french, followed by a japanese one. I'm not really keen on movies from my own country, truth be told, which is why it's excellent to not be limited by language.
At least one american movie would rate among my top ten, but since there are lots and lots of them, that's hardly surprising.
Like I said, you wouldn't notice them, and that's 'cos your focus wouldn't be on them. If you've been around them long enough you can get anything you might need from them just by having them in the periphery. But there's been extensive research done on subtitling, and different countries have different conventions for implementing them.Quote:
Subtitles don't require much thinking. It's reading ffs. I simply pointed out that when your eye is focusing on the bottom of the screen (even if it's not that long), it takes the eye away from the on-screen action. Now in dramas it is not as bad as in a horror or action movie.
British, and american subtitling, follows another type of system than ours, where all information that can possibly be crammed into a frame gets put there, which means that the amount of text you have to read is a lot more than the one someone in my country has to absorb.
Our translators favour a less literal approach where the a semantic core is transfered, but not every single word, and they have specific rules about the number of letters allowed on the screen, and how long it has to be displayed.
It's a system that's been through a lot of polishing before it became as good as it is today.
It doesn't take the eye away from anything.
The thing is, that since many of us don't really notice the subtitles anymore, we sort of get the information for free without losing out on the experience.Quote:
I agree with the edumacation part but it's rather simple logic that one's would prefer a movie made in a language they understand (not necessarily dubbed) than one that's written. If you are trying to learn another language (or are deaf) maybe subtitles are great but most people hit the movies to enjoy the entire cinematic experience.
Of course, a majority of us understand english quite well, which means that even the most backward of us only need the subtitles if the language gets tricky. (this only applies to english language movies, obviously)
Like I said though, it would be a hell of a lot easier for you to watch movies with subtitles if you had grown up with them.
Gracias og ja comprendo, je suis satisfaitQuote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
geen dank nodig
Oh yeah... how could I forget. Objectivity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
:naughty:
No, but that's only 'cos they do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Or have you missed all those comments about the french, for instance?
Regard it as a complimentQuote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
&
dont worry, it is garantued that one of the other nations will fæk up soon enough
(instructions : turn on news channel)
but where is our hero(ess) who can make it all.........nice & cozy?
President of USA?
Quote:
Lasker
Today, 01:13 AM
this is my question guys, why people and also the government of the United States called America his country if America in reality is a entire continent of many nations, is like compare people from Spain calling his country Europe??? this does not mean sense to me, what is your opinion about it?
You threatening to send in snatch squads ?Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
http://www.nigelhumour.co.uk/hos.jpg
Mind you after Disney charging us nearly $4 for a hot dog we won't pay the ransom
err, what?Quote:
Originally Posted by zed
I suppose it's a more like calling England, Great Britain. Rather than calling Spain, Europe.
Saying 'America' is easier than it's full title, I guess.
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Disney aren't my girlfriend's favourite people right now. Click my sig to read her article about it.
I looked before..... sharks are bastards and deserve to be eaten :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Serves them right for being so tasty.
/hopes she never sees this.
Meh, I'd been meaning to click that McChris thing that used to be in your sig, but didn't.
I'll wait awhile to find out about eating sharks :dry:
I would like to know just how they found out that shark liver oil is a good ingredient for hemorrhoid creams :unsure:
Where? :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
Exactly....get some before saying we have no dignity or integrity. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by uNz[i]
Give it your best shot, nob.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Not even close :D
1 de-merit for manrod.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
Quote:
Disney Shark Soup Shocker
A quality Sun-esque headline :01:
Busyman, I take the piss out of manker for being Welsh
Manker calls me Jocko McBannockburn, which I have larfed at oft times.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
I studiously abuse all things English, remembering that Welsh Wales is really just an annexe of same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
http://www.nigelhumour.co.uk/liz.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
What Welsh people does manker own?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
Try saying it really fast... :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420
:lol: manker "is" welsh ??
mankerish = Welsh
New word invented.
Feck's sake, how could I have missed this menagerie of manker mauling.
It'll take too long to refute it so instead I'll just strongly deny it.
YOU'RE NOT RIGHT, 'k.