Same-sex marriage bill passes

Quote:

---

What about the Humboldt Penguins ? Thats a know fact that when there's a shortage of females the males do a courtship dance , Weird eh ?

---

OMG, I remember reading a story about some penguins a while back. Two male penguins were virtually inseperable, and spent a lot of time with each other. They even built a nest together. When egg season came, they took a small rock and put it in the nest, hoping it would hatch. A researcher replaced the rock with a real egg and they hatched a baby girl. I thought that was so cute :lol:

Anyway, whether or not homosexuality is a product of genetics or upbringing, by the time the person is ready to get married, I don't think he/she will change his/her mind any time soon (assuming they aren't acting against their natural urges).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lynx

Sorry to upset your applecart, but that's bollocks.

The homosexual activity you see in those cases has absolutely nothing to do with sexuality, it is about domination.

---

Just about everything comes down to "Domination", whether its hetro or gay, consentual or rape.

I delibrately picked the Monkeys, Apes and Dogs because its rare of those species have a "Dominant Male" that gets all the womenfolk. (Yes i know they have dominant males.. but thats like a "pack leader", not a harem king :P

They are all rather "Promiscuous" that way....

---

Explain the straight male that fudgepacks another in jail.

Why does that happen?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lynx

Sorry to upset your applecart, but that's bollocks.

The homosexual activity you see in those cases has absolutely nothing to do with sexuality, it is about domination.

---

No, no, no...they have identified the gay gene/hormone whatchamacallittdoohickythingamajig in those animals so you're wrong. :snooty:

---

Im lost...

You agree its genetic in animals because they have identified the gene.. but dont think this is evidence that its genetic in humans because they havent identified the gene?

Are you of the opinion that we didnt evolve?

Or am i just totally misunderstanding?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

Just about everything comes down to "Domination", whether its hetro or gay, consentual or rape.

I delibrately picked the Monkeys, Apes and Dogs because its rare of those species have a "Dominant Male" that gets all the womenfolk. (Yes i know they have dominant males.. but thats like a "pack leader", not a harem king :P

They are all rather "Promiscuous" that way....

---

Explain the straight male that fudgepacks another in jail.

Why does that happen?

---

Quote:

---

Just about everything comes down to "Domination", whether its hetro or gay, consentual or rape.

---

And, lets face it... if there is a hole, some guys will attempt to put their equipment to work on that hole... irrespective of species or even if its warm.. :sick:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Explain the straight male that fudgepacks another in jail.

Why does that happen?

---

Quote:

---

Just about everything comes down to "Domination", whether its hetro or gay, consentual or rape.

---

And, lets face it... if there is a hole, some guys will attempt to put their equipment to work on that hole... irrespective of species or even if its warm.. :sick:

---

Hmmm but that's homosexual/bisexual so they must have the gene...right?

[QUOTE=bigboab]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peat moss

I had a similar situation when my girl was young. Most of the girls seem to protect gay boys. Maybe thats because they dont feel 'threatened' by them and see them for what they are.
Maybe the same applies to males who dont care about another male's sexual preference.:rolleyes:

---

Bob your really a girl? JK I enjoy this forum . I swear half you plicks were captains of the debate team in high school . I don't stand a chance . :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

No, no, no...they have identified the gay gene/hormone whatchamacallittdoohickythingamajig in those animals so you're wrong. :snooty:

---

Im lost...

You agree its genetic in animals because they have identified the gene.. but dont think this is evidence that its genetic in humans because they havent identified the gene?

Are you of the opinion that we didnt evolve?

Or am i just totally misunderstanding?

---

http://d21c.com/AnnesPlace/Summer2/FishingRod.gif

I'm sure ive posted before that i think theres only one sexuality... and its where-abouts on that line the individual is...

Although i've never come across a guy that does anything for me, or that i've been attracted to... I cant close my mind to the possibility in the future, as i cant see into the future.

I'm way over one end of that line; prefering the female of the species (viva la defference :wub: ).... but it is only the one line (again, in my opinion).

I've seen ladies that were hetro discover the delights of other ladies and become virtual lesbians; although they admit they are still attracted to men too....

Maybe we're all hedonists at heart ;)


Not sure where the last part of my last post would come under that argument though :sick:

[QUOTE=peat moss]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Bob your really a girl? JK I enjoy this forum . I swear half you plicks were captains of the debate team in high school . I don't stand a chance . :lol:

---

No, not a girl. maybe a big girls blouse though.:lol:

I find it interesting ,that it seems to be male members that posted here. Do the female's know something we don't ? Ot they don't care ? Or did I assume were all males ? :ohmy: There goes that theory . :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

I'm sure ive posted before that i think theres only one sexuality... and its where-abouts on that line the individual is...

Although i've never come across a guy that does anything for me, or that i've been attracted to... I cant close my mind to the possibility in the future, as i cant see into the future.

I'm way over one end of that line; prefering the female of the species (viva la defference :wub: ).... but it is only the one line (again, in my opinion).

I've seen ladies that were hetro discover the delights of other ladies and become virtual lesbians; although they admit they are still attracted to men too....

Maybe we're all hedonists at heart ;)


Not sure where the last part of my last post would come under that argument though :sick:

---

Anyone can be gay or straight..now or in the future.

Many say no 'cause they are not attracted to the same sex/opposite sex now.

Change their circumstances and their sexual preference may change.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peat moss

I find it interesting ,that it seems to be male members that posted here. Do the female's know something we don't ? Ot they don't care ? Or did I assume were all males ? :ohmy: There goes that theory . :lol:

---

Well, I assume the FileSharing community is made up of 90% guys, so it's really thin pickings around here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xagest

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peat moss

I find it interesting ,that it seems to be male members that posted here. Do the female's know something we don't ? Ot they don't care ? Or did I assume were all males ? :ohmy: There goes that theory . :lol:

---

Well, I assume the FileSharing community is made up of 90% guys, so it's really thin pickings around here.

---

Well said, sorry for my ignorance . :)

I have no problem with the state recognising the union of two people. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with people making a legal commitment to each other. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with couples of the same gender having the same pension rights, property rights, whatever rights as couples of mixed gender.

I do not see this as a point which is even open to debate. It's just a couple who want to have their love recognized and accepted. Who want the same rights as any other couple.

So long as we are talking about consenting adults, of sound mind, live and let live says I.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

I'm sure ive posted before that i think theres only one sexuality... and its where-abouts on that line the individual is...

Although i've never come across a guy that does anything for me, or that i've been attracted to... I cant close my mind to the possibility in the future, as i cant see into the future.

I'm way over one end of that line; prefering the female of the species (viva la defference :wub: ).... but it is only the one line (again, in my opinion).

I've seen ladies that were hetro discover the delights of other ladies and become virtual lesbians; although they admit they are still attracted to men too....

Maybe we're all hedonists at heart ;)


Not sure where the last part of my last post would come under that argument though :sick:

---

Anyone can be gay or straight..now or in the future.

Many say no 'cause they are not attracted to the same sex/opposite sex now.

Change their circumstances and their sexual preference may change.

---

Is n't that bisexuality tho. You feel comfortable with either ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

I'm sure ive posted before that i think theres only one sexuality... and its where-abouts on that line the individual is...

Although i've never come across a guy that does anything for me, or that i've been attracted to... I cant close my mind to the possibility in the future, as i cant see into the future.

I'm way over one end of that line; prefering the female of the species (viva la defference :wub: ).... but it is only the one line (again, in my opinion).

I've seen ladies that were hetro discover the delights of other ladies and become virtual lesbians; although they admit they are still attracted to men too....

Maybe we're all hedonists at heart ;)


Not sure where the last part of my last post would come under that argument though :sick:

---

Anyone can be gay or straight..now or in the future.

Many say no 'cause they are not attracted to the same sex/opposite sex now.

Change their circumstances and their sexual preference may change.

---

You went from "anyone can be gay or straight" to "their sexual preference may change"

I find that confusing, I would appreciate clarification.

Cheers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

I'm sure ive posted before that i think theres only one sexuality... and its where-abouts on that line the individual is...

Although i've never come across a guy that does anything for me, or that i've been attracted to... I cant close my mind to the possibility in the future, as i cant see into the future.

I'm way over one end of that line; prefering the female of the species (viva la defference :wub: ).... but it is only the one line (again, in my opinion).

I've seen ladies that were hetro discover the delights of other ladies and become virtual lesbians; although they admit they are still attracted to men too....

Maybe we're all hedonists at heart ;)


Not sure where the last part of my last post would come under that argument though :sick:

---

Anyone can be gay or straight..now or in the future.

Many say no 'cause they are not attracted to the same sex/opposite sex now.

Change their circumstances and their sexual preference may change.

---

Sorry I disagree. What you are virtually saying is 'needs must. That part I agree with. But most gays do not have that choice. Their sexuality comes naturally to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

I have no problem with the state recognising the union of two people. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with people making a legal commitment to each other. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with couples of the same gender having the same pension rights, property rights, whatever rights as couples of mixed gender.

I do not see this as a point which is even open to debate. It's just a couple who want to have their love recognized and accepted. Who want the same rights as any other couple.

So long as we are talking about consenting adults, of sound mind, live and let live says I.

---

Ya the scary thing is tho . There's a group that wants to limit how they disolve the union . Make it harder to divorce. Thats crap .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Anyone can be gay or straight..now or in the future.

Many say no 'cause they are not attracted to the same sex/opposite sex now.

Change their circumstances and their sexual preference may change.

---

Sorry I disagree. What you are virtually saying is 'needs must. That part I agree with. But most gays do not have that choice. Their sexuality comes naturally to them.

---

But "needs must" only works on the basis that people need to shag. Which they don't. It's not like eating or drinking water ffs.

I can assure you that if I was in a totally male environment then I would stick to the "menage a une".

Anyone who thinks differently is (at least) latently homosexual.

Not that I've got anything against that, busy.

Slightly off-topic: I wonder how long we'll have to wait until two straight men "accidentally" get married whilst on teh piss (probably from a rugby team...). That will be most amusing. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peat moss

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

I have no problem with the state recognising the union of two people. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with people making a legal commitment to each other. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with couples of the same gender having the same pension rights, property rights, whatever rights as couples of mixed gender.

I do not see this as a point which is even open to debate. It's just a couple who want to have their love recognized and accepted. Who want the same rights as any other couple.

So long as we are talking about consenting adults, of sound mind, live and let live says I.

---

Ya the scary thing is tho . There's a group that wants to limit how they disolve the union . Make it harder to divorce. Thats crap .

---

Equal rights of union = equal rights of divorce.

Any other position is untenable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Anyone can be gay or straight..now or in the future.

Many say no 'cause they are not attracted to the same sex/opposite sex now.

Change their circumstances and their sexual preference may change.

---

Sorry I disagree. What you are virtually saying is 'needs must. That part I agree with. But most gays do not have that choice. Their sexuality comes naturally to them.

---

Aww ffs where do you get this choice shit?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Sorry I disagree. What you are virtually saying is 'needs must. That part I agree with. But most gays do not have that choice. Their sexuality comes naturally to them.

---

Aww ffs where do you get this choice shit?

---

I choose not to shag men.

Always have always will, whatever the circumstances.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Withcheese

Slightly off-topic: I wonder how long we'll have to wait until two straight men "accidentally" get married whilst on teh piss (probably from a rugby team...). That will be most amusing. :D

---

Guess it depends on who shaved their ass ? Was it the pitcher or catcher ?
Oh great Vegas has enought problems with all those "Elvie " :ph34r:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by peat moss

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Withcheese

Slightly off-topic: I wonder how long we'll have to wait until two straight men "accidentally" get married whilst on teh piss (probably from a rugby team...). That will be most amusing. :D

---

Guess it depends on who shaved their ass ? Was it the pitcher or catcher ?
Oh great Vegas has enought problems with all those "Elvie " :ph34r:

---

What's an "Elvie" Peat? Is it, perhaps, the plural of Elvis?http://moderation.invisionzone.com/s...efault/gep.gif


Edit: 10k posts again. Get the fuck in.:01:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Aww ffs where do you get this choice shit?

---

I choose not to shag men.

Always have always will, whatever the circumstances.

---

I was refereeing to people in prison. That is their excuse not mine. Wait a minute I dont need an excuse. Awe shit I'm getting deeper into it.:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

I choose not to shag men.

Always have always will, whatever the circumstances.

---

I was refereeing to people in prison. That is their excuse not mine. Wait a minute I dont need an excuse. Awe shit I'm getting deeper into it.:lol:

---

See there's the thing, if I was in prison and another man shagged me, that would be rape.

I personally would have no interest in shagging another man. Like I said earlier, the "menage a une" would be the sexual action for me.

Being in a totally male environment would not be a "needs must" situation for me. However, as I also said, to each his own.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

I have no problem with the state recognising the union of two people. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with people making a legal commitment to each other. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with couples of the same gender having the same pension rights, property rights, whatever rights as couples of mixed gender.

I do not see this as a point which is even open to debate. It's just a couple who want to have their love recognized and accepted. Who want the same rights as any other couple.

So long as we are talking about consenting adults, of sound mind, live and let live says I.

---

Seems damned fair to me. Let it be so Mr McConnell.

If I can make an analogy. An alcoholic when desparate will drink anything if he has no other choice. I was just wondering if the same would apply to a sex mechanic?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

If I can make an analogy. An alcoholic when desparate will drink anything if he has no other choice. I was just wondering if the same would apply to a sex mechanic?

---

Possibly, p'raps you should ask one.

Given her posts in this thread and others busy may be able to help.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

If I can make an analogy. An alcoholic when desparate will drink anything if he has no other choice. I was just wondering if the same would apply to a sex mechanic?

---

I tend to agree with JP a Menage a Une is preferable.


:01: for teh self loving. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

I have no problem with the state recognising the union of two people. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with people making a legal commitment to each other. Whether they be of different gender, or of the same gender.

I have no problem with couples of the same gender having the same pension rights, property rights, whatever rights as couples of mixed gender.

I do not see this as a point which is even open to debate. It's just a couple who want to have their love recognized and accepted. Who want the same rights as any other couple.

So long as we are talking about consenting adults, of sound mind, live and let live says I.

---

Seems damned fair to me. Let it be so Mr McConnell.

---

Mayhap we should send that post to him as a first draft.

What say you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

Seems damned fair to me. Let it be so Mr McConnell.

---

Mayhap we should send that post to him as a first draft.

What say you.

---

It sounds like a good idea to me. In fact it is high time he had an ID on this board. We could dig him out of a few holes.



:unsure:

He wasn't Livy perchance?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

If I can make an analogy. An alcoholic when desparate will drink anything if he has no other choice. I was just wondering if the same would apply to a sex mechanic?

---

I tend to agree with JP a Menage a Une is preferable.


:01: for teh self loving. :lol:

---

I totally agree. Can anyone enlighten me as to why apparently straight men/woman do this in prison?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

I tend to agree with JP a Menage a Une is preferable.


:01: for teh self loving. :lol:

---

I totally agree. Can anyone enlighten me as to why apparently straight men/woman do this in prison?

---

Sure. If you mean wanking, it's for sexual release.

If you mean anal sex, it's because the lack of females brings out the hitherto quiescent homosexuality within them.

They say that those that deny it the most are the ones unsure of their own sexuality too.... :ph34r:

So I'd better remember not to bend down if me and JPaul ever share a cell :ph34r:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

So I'd better remember not to bend down if me and JPaul ever share a cell :ph34r:

---

Especially if you keep your wallet in your back pocket :no:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

I totally agree. Can anyone enlighten me as to why apparently straight men/woman do this in prison?

---

Sure. If you mean wanking, it's for sexual release.

If you mean anal sex, it's because the lack of females brings out the hitherto quiescent homosexuality within them.

---

Is this quiescent homosexuality in everyone?

P.S. I know what wanking does.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

I totally agree. Can anyone enlighten me as to why apparently straight men/woman do this in prison?

---

Sure. If you mean wanking, it's for sexual release.

If you mean anal sex, it's because the lack of females brings out the hitherto quiescent homosexuality within them.

---

Or latent, as it were.

J'agree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Sure. If you mean wanking, it's for sexual release.

If you mean anal sex, it's because the lack of females brings out the hitherto quiescent homosexuality within them.

---

Is this quiescent homosexuality in everyone?

P.S. I know what wanking does.:)

---

I think not.

I understand that Busyman and RF may have doubts about their own preferences but I have no such worries. I definitely find the thought of a dick up my arse quite repugnant.

:D