Can't argue with that.
Really, I can't I just don't understand your point.
As I understand it you are a black lesbian and you want to buy insurance but can't. Is that correct.
Printable View
Can't argue with that.
Really, I can't I just don't understand your point.
As I understand it you are a black lesbian and you want to buy insurance but can't. Is that correct.
No, if I can't put my girlfriend on my insurance why should two hershey highway drivers?Quote:
Originally posted by JPaul@7 October 2003 - 00:28
Can't argue with that.
Really, I can't I just don't understand your point.
As I understand it you are a black lesbian and you want to buy insurance but can't. Is that correct.
Smartass
Sorry, wrong again.Quote:
Originally posted by Busyman@7 October 2003 - 00:40
...So now two gay guys can now share health insurance and enjoy the benefits of "marriage" and me and my girlfriend can't unless we are married...
Ever hear of "commonlaw?"
:ninja:
Sorry, wrong again.Quote:
Originally posted by MagicNakor+7 October 2003 - 02:29--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MagicNakor @ 7 October 2003 - 02:29)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@7 October 2003 - 00:40
...So now two gay guys can now share health insurance and enjoy the benefits of "marriage" and me and my girlfriend can't unless we are married...
Ever hear of "commonlaw?"
:ninja: [/b][/quote]
Doesn't apply in all circumstances. Also commonlaw marriage is still "marriage". One could argue that the heterosexual couple should just get married. My point is a gay couple that is not married gets the benefit. The heterosexual couple does not and cannot unless they are married, commonlaw or not.