Well I truely believe that flaming can be really reduced if people avoid nasty or insulting comments. :)
It's not a battle to see who is smarter than the next guy. But I am smarter that Zed. :D
Printable View
Well I truely believe that flaming can be really reduced if people avoid nasty or insulting comments. :)
It's not a battle to see who is smarter than the next guy. But I am smarter that Zed. :D
ok fuck u! :lol: :lol:
:flame:
After reading all posts which postulate energetically about Nobody's real identity, I have come to the inescapable conclusion that perhaps you are all on the wrong track
Perhaps 'nobody' is a misnomer, and you are energetically postulating about the existence of one who doesn't de facto have an existence, other than being resident in our collective psyches. Nobody is I suspect the 'alter' of another persona.
Perhaps therein lies the true mystery. Significant note is made that I was the only one to discern this possibility.
..hold that thought...
Yeah. Maybe it just turns out the way you want it to based on your votes. :lol:
Quote:
Originally posted by Z@11 April 2003 - 00:32
ok fuck u! :lol: :lol:
:flame:
Quote:
2. There will be no excessive use of profanity. Please keep all foul language to a minimum.
really. hes the 'alter' of somebody1234. :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by chloe_cc2002@10 April 2003 - 23:35
After reading all posts which postulate energetically about Nobody's real identity, I have come to the inescapable conclusion that perhaps you are all on the wrong track
Perhaps 'nobody' is a misnomer, and you are energetically postulating about the existence of one who doesn't de facto have an existence, other than being resident in our collective psyches. Nobody is I suspect the 'alter' of another persona.
Perhaps therein lies the true mystery. Significant note is made that I was the only one to discern this possibility.
..hold that thought...
Quote:
Originally posted by Nobody1234+10 April 2003 - 23:40--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Nobody1234 @ 10 April 2003 - 23:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Z@11 April 2003 - 00:32
ok fuck u! :lol: :lol:
:flame:
[/b][/quote]Quote:
2. There will be no excessive use of profanity. Please keep all foul language to a minimum.
sorry, its inevitable. it had to happen at one point. u can check every single thread. there ya go. just fulfillin my duties as lounge lizard. :P
really. hes the 'alter' of somebody1234. :lol: [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Z+11 April 2003 - 00:51--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Z @ 11 April 2003 - 00:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--chloe_cc2002@10 April 2003 - 23:35
After reading all posts which postulate energetically about Nobody's real identity, I have come to the inescapable conclusion that perhaps you are all on the wrong track
Perhaps 'nobody' is a misnomer, and you are energetically postulating about the existence of one who doesn't de facto have an existence, other than being resident in our collective psyches. Nobody is I suspect the 'alter' of another persona.
Perhaps therein lies the true mystery. Significant note is made that I was the only one to discern this possibility.
..hold that thought...
Who me?
yes, u. or are u the evil twin?
:devil:
Is this a concession that I have been validated/vindicated? Please don't hesitate to be stoic in your response, fortified by the view that I will react appropriately and maturely as always. :blink:
Nobody is Somebody's alter? If so, then who is the dominant or main persona. Somebody's latent and timely appearance could suggest that somebody is the submissive persona. On the other hand, appearances can be deceptive as this thread has demonstrated to me in all it's complexity.
As we embark on the next step of this journey, we must consider whether there are more nobody's or somebody's inhabiting the same 'body' as 'no-body' or 'some-body'. The possibilities are infinite.
hold that thought...