Last one to post wins the internets

Seriously, fuck the current U.S.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

Credibly accused human trafficker/rapist Andrew Tate mysteriously released from travel ban and comes to US via private jet. Meanwhile, (non-white) people documented to have committed no crime other than illegally entering the US, languish in conditions outlawed by the Geneva Convention in Guantanamo.

---

"Credibly accused" has less meaning to a man-of-means such as Tate - he disgusts me, but the powers-that-be cannot detain him for being a scumball.

We've all seen situations like his.

Illegals are much easier to deal with, no matter your personal inclination to give them a pass, one and all.


So, to sum up:

Tate should be confined, by whatever means, but it isn't happening.

Illegals are being rounded up for repatriation, which pleases the masses and is a political plus for Trump.


Your formulation is lacking.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

Seriously, fuck the current U.S.

---

I will disregard your comment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

You need to ask?

---

Watch then try to dispute anything said. You'll try to cite something from Fox and each of those will show to be skewed/slight-of-hand/outright lies. C'mon, let's see how it plays out. Facts vs Fox it'll be fun.

---

To do so would reveal nothing.

MSNBC has been diagnosed, and will probably not survive.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

It's astounding that you so casually use the word 'repatriation' to include an entire race of people, yet were so staunch in your defense of Jewish atrocities not more than 48 hours ago.

People breaking their backs to pick vegetables for $2/hour are inherently not criminals. Criminals take the easy way of doing things to avoid hard work. Or, say, commit war crimes condemned by most nations in the free world.

---

Saul Alinsky would be so proud of you - too bad he didn't stick round to see how this is turning out.

Logic is finally going to defeat emotion.

Your children will survive without a Democrat teat to suckle.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

You open a HUGE can of worms when you mention 'repatriation' in addition to your 'they were there first' argument in terms of Mexicans.

https://education.nationalgeographic...d-lost-mexico/

---

In the Book of Conflicts, the geographic proceeds go to the entity whom History records as having won.

At this time, we're trying to avoid the wars you are advocating.

You're also painting Chalice into a corner.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Chalice is a big boy regardless of the corner he finds himself in unless there's a fluffy bunny in that corner

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

So *now* we're changing direction once again. Your stance is no longer about 'they were there first' but to might makes right'.

Can we just say that you pick a side and care not what they do?

---

So, you aren't capable of case-by-case analysis?

Okay - who did the people you would refer to as "Native Americans" take this land from?


If the immediate aim is to 'stop the war', some arms need twisting, and some bullets need bitten.


Ping to your pong, sir.

Stop which war, Kevin?

Nothing to see here

Coz it's Newsmax

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/pet...01/id/1200976/

Nope nope nope

Nope nope nope

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Stop which war, Kevin?

---

Which war are we talking about?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Case by case just means you pick and choose your ethics based on who you want to win.

That's also how atrocities occur.

---

"Case-by-case" determines expedience.

If atrocities somehow result, well, we'll see, won't we?

For Meg's edification:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHpSDWhgrcc

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Look what you've been reduced to...


Tell me - if both sides (and just to be clear, I'm referring to Ukraine and Russia) just lay down their arms and retreat to the territories they currently occupy, how would you feel about that?

Nothing to see here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

That just gives Russia a further advancement point for the next time.

Putin doesn't keep his word.

Sorry for the Wikipedia link but there was no better short synopsis of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty signed by Russia, US, Britain, and Ukraine. Ukraine was the 3rd largest nuclear power after Soviet Union broke apart. Ukraine gave up nuclear arsenal for guarantee of sovereignty and protection.

Guess who broke the deal when he invaded...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukra...nty%20in%20the

---

"Putin doesn't keep his word."


I don't disagree.

Tell me precisely how we ensure he does, short of boots (our boots) on the ground?

He can keep doing what he's doing until the Ukraine has no more bodies to sacrifice.

Remember, if Europe steps-up like they've apparently promised, Putin has spoken of his willingness to use tactical nukes on European/NATO countries, including the U.K.

So, if Putin can't be trusted, we're looking at WWIII.

One more thing:

Surely you've heard of The Azov Brigade?

They hang out in Eastern Ukraine and kill stray Russians.

They're also actual, real live Nazis.

Putin doesn't like them, but Zelenskyy does.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

So YOU think WE should go to war.

We could have saved a lot of time if you'd just said so at the outset.

Nothing to see here

Nothing to see here

Nobody puts chavis in a corner as Patrick Swayze will have you know while he blinds you with his awesome dance moves and embarrasses all the conservative parents present at the hop.

Is the paint caustic or something? Cos I would just put on my asbestos proof dancing boots and do the twist all over your curtains and ruin your wanky fucking carpet, and leave third degree burns all over your the slack-jawed, stroked out side of your funny looking faces.

You'll just throw your back out, old man

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

So YOU think WE should go to war.

We could have saved a lot of time if you'd just said so at the outset.

---

Out of curiosity, did you think the UK, Germany and the rest of NATO should have gone to war in that little Afghanistan adventure 20-odd years ago when the US/NATO called out Article 5?

If yes, how is support for Ukraine any different? Sure, they are not part of NATO, but the US gave security guarantees back when they gave up their nukes. If Putin now attacks a NATO member, are you saying that you advocate not responding to that either?

We could save a lot of time in the future if you say so now.

Nothing to see here

The Deal is not in place yet, girls.

You'll just have to wait, like the rest of us.

This is 19+ minutes long - it may be a bit beyond most of you, but if you can stand the education, you'll be...well...educated.:

<em>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHX_jNS6cDI

One last question for the evening:

Europe/Non-US NATO wants to help Ukraine.

What will their compulsion be if Putin turns off the gas?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbmfMSEhjHs


Personally, I think Jake was just making a play for MSNBC's 5 viewers.

Nothing to see here