Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gripper
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.
Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gripper
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.
Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.
So shouldn't this be in the drawing room?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel
Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .
So you can PPK a girl without digital dislocation.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Nah, most of the posts here are full of shit.
So shouldn't this be in the drawing room?
No.
I was actually implementing a clever play on words, I meant 'shit' as in fecal matter. This thread shouldn't be in the Drawing Room as the thought of other folk defacating makes those straight laced republican folk nauseous.
One must have consideration for even the anally retentive :smilie4:
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Live and let Live i say, :smoke: not for me but eh if ya dig it get on wi it. Watch out for the prolapses though eh, need to measure the amount you bugger each other irekons, 2 much goin up & it falls out, i know ive seen the video!!
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip Monk
So, enlighten me, what would the normal, natural function be, which involved the arse as a way of getting things into the body. As stated earlier, this isn't a moral judgement we're talking about here, so try not to use those tricks again. Were talking biology.
The arse is used to get ........... into the body. This function is used in order to allow us to ........... Please fill in the blanks for me.
Oh deary me :no2:
I don't think anal nor oral sex is a normal, natural biological function to get stuff into the body. I've never said I did. A chap earlier implied disagreement with this statement in its entirety purely because of the 'in door' nature of the mouth.
I mentioned it not because I disagreed with your, Chip Monk's, post but because you mentioned mumbo-jumbo and it put me in mind of it.
I think I'll post this sentence again for no other reason than it's particularly well constructed and I'm rather fond of it; "
Simply put, if a mouthful of cawk can be described as 'not wrong' soley because the mouth can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door'. Then an arseful of cawk can also be described as 'not wrong' because the arse can be used as, but not exclusively as, an 'in door' ".
Ladies and Gentlemen, witness the Magnificent Slimeo. A man with a mind as slippery as an oiled racing snake. :simile:
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel
Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .
So you can PPK a girl without digital dislocation.
Wrong:no2:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bible
And God said unto Barry, "Why are you still having casual sex with a woman in her vagina? I put an entrance right next to it which carries no risk of accidental pregnancy! Honestly..."
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bible
And God said unto Barry, "Why are you still having casual sex with a woman in her vagina? I put an entrance right next to it which carries no risk of accidental pregnancy! Honestly..."
I've told you, it's an exit, not an entry.
Typical of you people to try to twist things with your religious prejudices and the ignoring of science.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
If you practice turtle-heading enough, you can get it down to a fine art.
As everyone knows, art is a science - therefore, your arse being an entry can actually be thought of as scientific :smilie4:
