Is it that I don't say 'somewhat' very often :unsure:
Printable View
Is it that I don't say 'somewhat' very often :unsure:
hah. My edit > your poast.
I'm disgusted, gentlemen. I hadn't even considered the fringes of the extent of mod powers. Seems nobody else did either.
Why haven't the Welsh conquered the world already.
Right, this time I'm really going to go sleep for reals. It has been too many late nights, and getting out of bed is getting to be a bother.
For some reason my coding gets better, tho.
We're too busy listening to Geordie cawk-smugglers.Quote:
Originally Posted by chavis
It's the only hindrance, I'm sure.
Late night chortle endorphins ftwQuote:
Originally Posted by Snee
l8rz
You might not be aware that your avatar looks horrendous on a dark background (black stealth), probably why you're totally baffled at my lack of a dignified demeanor towards you.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
About your yellow pants thing, so you are an immigrant then?
I read on the Internet prince Charles of wales is the anti-Christ.Is this so?If so wales will rule the world 1day:)
Well he would be the anti-christ if the mark of the beast was huge ears instead of 666, sadly he is just confused and in danger of being blown away in high winds.Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggyjuarez
That'll show everyone who says you don't read :01:Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggyjuarez
Ok it was a utube video:(
Close enough! At least you've remembered something for days :01:
-=-=-
Just sorted an error I've been chasing for days.
Prob is, I did it by removing one line of code, and thus far idfk what it's even meant to do, or rather what the id it injects is meant to do. Some speshul person added it years ago, and there's zero documentation.
This probably means I'll have to spend hours doing tests and tracing my way through half the system.
Lulz, I can't look at an intervjew b3ta did with kuntandthegang, on account of it being adult content, according to the company firewall.
Prolly got logged as well. Genious.
Hoi! :angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Hmmm, you're right. Bummer :dabs:
In my defence, I think the avatar pre-dated the background...
EDIT: Jesus, all the smilies are fucked too.
I thought Bo did my avatar.
This whole site looks terrible in stealth, the only reason I use it is because the other theme is too sunny a disposition for my tastes, I prefer the rugged clash of incongruity.
any of ewe bawlbags know if it'd wurk if i had my pc hdmi out to a splitter, out from the splitter to an amp and then out from the amp to a tv?
edit: masterful paint diagram to explain what I mean easily:smilie4:
Attachment 102594
edit2: it's currently set up like that but without the amp, like, and wurks fine.
Rod off Rodney McRod :snooty:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
In other news, looks like I missed a bit of a forum car-crash over the last couple of days :dabs:
You need to plug the stuff in and not leave gaps, like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
Also :- :blink:
I'm using hdmi cables :earl:, like, not badly drawn arrows.Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbarossaYou need to plug the stuff in and not leave gaps, like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
Also :- :blink:
Something is lost on me, what purpose would an amp serve for a digital signal?!?
Dave isn't one for fading away or sleepy swan-songs, it seems :ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbarossaRod off Rodney McRod :snooty:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
In other news, looks like I missed a bit of a forum car-crash over the last couple of days :dabs:
Huh. What happened. I forgot I had the internets.
Guise. I appear to be phleying eve online again. See you in six months.
Not really. Maybe.
Who? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
If it is working fine now then introducing the amp will not change things. A couple of questions though, what is the amp (make/model) and how far away is the 2nd TV?Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
edit: There is a method to my madness in asking the questions, if it is a modern amp you can use the amp to switch sources via the comfort of it's remote control and then use the splitter to switch between the two TV's, although at that point you could simply put in an HDMI repeater instead.
edit 2: sumthink loik this:
http://i.imgur.com/DprL6.png
that would be a good idea but I only want the amp and speakers on the one tv. I did stick the amp in as I planned and it's all working fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtemisIf it is working fine now then introducing the amp will not change things. A couple of questions though, what is the amp (make/model) and how far away is the 2nd TV?Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
edit: There is a method to my madness in asking the questions, if it is a modern amp you can use the amp to switch sources via the comfort of it's remote control and then use the splitter to switch between the two TV's, although at that point you could simply put in an HDMI repeater instead.
edit 2: sumthink loik this:
http://i.imgur.com/DprL6.png
i'm not sure on the amp model and i'm far too whopped to check at the moment
edit: it's a yamaha dsp-ax861se
An old axiom that I strongly believe is 'if it is working don't fix it' so sweet that it is up and running.
My suggestion was just a way of simplifying the input selection by running the inputs through the receiver/amp. The output from the amp passes both audio and video through so you can have the 5.1 hometheater throbnobulating for TV1 and have the gay little TV speakers on TV2.
I can see your point, like, but it's working and i'm happy as is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
Nobody answered my question, what's with the amp?
I'm pretty sure he's referring to a receiver, not a separate power amp.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
EDIT:
http://www.superfi.co.uk/P-7677-disc...amplifier.aspxQuote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
Your question was pedantic, I thought it was another joke regarding slightly incorrect terms, in this case bo called his receiver an amp which is a throwback to the days when you had a separate amplifier for your stereo instead of an integrated receiver.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I've got a room with separates for the surround sound processor and 4 individual amps for the 7 channels. I have to admit the newer amps that are now designed to run all of the channels in DD/DTSQuote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
arecan be quite capable of doing the job. The prices are amazingly reasonable for what you get. Mid-line or better Onkyo is eerily good for the money...
All-in-one is VASTLY more user-friendly, too.
I can't get my pc to output anything other than stereo. I've got a gtx 465 which is supposed to do 5.1 through hdmi (according to google) but windows (7 x64) isn't recognising my receiver and seems to think the hdmi cable is plugged straight into the tv (hence it only allowing stereo).
Any suggestions?
I forgot that I do shit like that, but this one happened to be a genuine puzzler. I have never owned a home theater receiver in my life, thus I would have never associated the two terms.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtemisYour question was pedantic, I thought it was another joke regarding slightly incorrect terms, in this case bo called his receiver an amp which is a throwback to the days when you had a separate amplifier for your stereo instead of an integrated receiver.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Been watching the new iPad unveiling. Looking pretty awesome.
2048 x 1536 "Retina" screen. 3.1 million pixels on a 10" screen. :wacko:
A5X processor, quad-core graphics.
5-megapixel camera on the back which has 1080p recording capabilities.
Siri.
4G LTE! :O
No price increase.
Start a hardware thread? I'm ignorant when it comes to this sound related stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
Except that it's still running iOS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiz
How much cooler is the iPad to the itouch?they seem very similar but the fat1 seems harder 2go out and about with.