That's the way it is with Billy.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Which reminds me, didn't we ban him once?
Printable View
That's the way it is with Billy.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Which reminds me, didn't we ban him once?
How did you know :ohmy:Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
Ehh, he's not doing much harm. At least wait until this ID alienates a few more sections of the board. He's not popped into the lounge to say hi yet.
Billy wouldn't want that, coz it would be like special treatment and if he believes in one thing it's fair treatment for all.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Except the Israelis obviously.
Well, I know it may seem as if I am insulted, but it annoyes me that someone thinks he can write stuff like that, and all will go quiet. <_<
It appears he was wrong tho'. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by tralalala
Well, it seemed as if he wasn't going to accept that fact was he now.. ;)
The words "Leopard" and "Spots" seem strangely apt.Quote:
Originally Posted by tralalala
Shit, who are you calling Hoi!!!?? :huh:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Ooh, a gang, scarrrrry!!
Why don't you read another side of the story, not that you're interested in any other truth than your own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jews for Justice in the Middle East
Quote:
Introduction
The standard Zionist position is that they showed up in Palestine in the late 19th century to reclaim their ancestral homeland. Jews bought land and started building up the Jewish community there. They were met with increasingly violent opposition from the Palestinian Arabs, presumably stemming from the Arabs' inherent anti-Semitism. The Zionists were then forced to defend themselves and, in one form or another, this same situation continues up to today.
The problem with this explanation is that it is simply not true, as the documentary evidence in this booklet will show. What really happened was that the Zionist movement, from the beginning, looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the indigenous Arab population so that Israel could be a wholly Jewish state, or as much as was possible. Land bought by the Jewish National Fund was held in the name of the Jewish people and could never be sold or even leased back to Arabs (a situation which continues to the present).
The Arab community, as it became increasingly aware of the Zionists' intentions, strenuously opposed further Jewish immigration and land buying because it posed a real and imminent danger to the very existence of Arab society in Palestine. Because of this opposition, the entire Zionist project never could have been realized without the military backing of the British. The vast majority of the population of Palestine, by the way, had been Arabic since the seventh century A.D. (Over 1200 years)
In short, Zionism was based on a faulty, colonialist world view that the rights of the indigenous inhabitants didn't matter. The Arabs' opposition to Zionism wasn't based on anti-Semitism but rather on a totally reasonable fear of the dispossession of their people.
One further point: being Jewish ourselves, the position we present here is critical of Zionism but is in no way anti-Semitic. We do not believe that the Jews acted worse than any other group might have acted in their situation. The Zionists (who were a distinct minority of the Jewish people until after WWII) had an understandable desire to establish a place where Jews could be masters of their own fate, given the bleak history of Jewish oppression. Especially as the danger to European Jewry crystalized in the late 1930's and after, the actions of the Zionists were propelled by real desperation.
But so were the actions of the Arabs. The mythic "land without people for a people without land" was already home to 700,000 Palestinians in 1919. This is the root of the problem, as we shall see.
Read the full account here.
What you are espousing Rafi is Zionism, not Judaism, Israel is a Zionist state, not a Jewish one.
" ...not that you're interested in any other truth than your own"
:lol:
As ever, the inadvertent master of irony.
Purely as an aside " ... any truth other than your own" would be much better.