Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by peat moss
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman™
That's great.
You're still gay.
Sooo whats the point ? It is after all , is homo butt sex wrong ? He says no and I agree , so what if he's gay thats not the issue . ;)
I never said it was. You didn't say "what's the point" when Celebs said he wasn't gay.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewizeard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip Monk
What's all this spam about love and relationships.
It's a simple question ffs. Is there any scientific justification for the penis being inserted into the anus. Is it a natural thing to do. Surely the simple answer is no, it's not a natural thing to do. It is therefore an un-natural act, or to put it another way, wrong.
You can use all the mumbo-jumbo you want to justify it. That changes nowt, people are performing an un-natural act for their carnal gratification..
Could be true..but then explain why the anus is placed so close to the vagina .. That was asking for trouble.
... in the end who cares...as long as they keep it out of my anus...
:lol: :lol:
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman™
Sex with a man, you are gay.
Man on man sex is a homosexual act. If you have had sex with women it doesn't discount the fact that you've had homosex.
Sex with a woman, you are straight.
Man on woman sex is a
heterosexual act. If you have had sex with a man it doesn't discount the fact that you've had
heterosex.
Wait - both can't be true.
Omfg, things aren't always black and white :o
Sure it is. Fella slams another fella in da butt, he's gay.
Ahh but as SGG says, they are just lables labels.
The act and the label can be quite different. However, I equate that homosexual act with the label.
I don't use the label to necessarily be exclusionary. Gay fellas have wives ffs. I'm not going to stop calling them gay. They like fucking men (or getting fucked by them).
At the same time I equate 'straight' as being exclusionary. I do not consider gay and straight as being opposites.
Here's a mini-poll for the fellas:
If one of your male friends all-of-sudden tells you he likes to have sex with guys, would you consider him gay?
I would. It would be black-and-white for me....since we are dealing with mere labels and all.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman™
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Sex with a woman, you are straight.
Man on woman sex is a heterosexual act. If you have had sex with a man it doesn't discount the fact that you've had heterosex.
Wait - both can't be true.
Omfg, things aren't always black and white :o
Sure it is. Fella slams another fella in da butt, he's gay.
Ahh but as SGG says, they are just
lables labels.
The act and the label can be quite different. However, I equate that homosexual act with the label.
I don't use the label to necessarily be exclusionary. Gay fellas have wives ffs. I'm not going to stop calling them gay. They like fucking men (or getting fucked by them).
At the same time I equate 'straight' as being exclusionary. I do not consider gay and straight as being opposites.
Here's a mini-poll for the fellas:
If one of your male friends all-of-sudden tells you he likes to have sex with guys, would you consider him gay?
I would. It would be black-and-white for me....since we are dealing with mere labels and all.
Now that's a "mini poll" for you.
1 option and then you tell us what you think.
Fan-tastic.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gripper
Feck me,shouldn't this be in the drawing room.
Gripper , I thought that too , we could title it "Exit only" . :)
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
you guys talkn about nothing again?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
