He probably won't the google the answer and say it was obvious either. :pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Printable View
He probably won't the google the answer and say it was obvious either. :pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
:lol: :lol: :lol:
I actually thought that the 'Great Article' comment meant that Busy had changed his mind.
Now I think of it, I can kinda see the context with the separate your guns and ammo /change the law comment, tho'.
i didn't google. i couldn't sleep so i just started reading random articles on snopes
sleep depravation does crazy things. it looks like manker and busyman are agreeing :blink:
shame it's about me being wrong/paranoid :geptard:
OoooookayyyyyyyyyyyQuote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
thats the best i could decipher from "He probably won't the google the answer and say it was obvious either." :nostradamus:
Read teh historyQuote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
A dead issue now. :ermm:
I do think that the US couldn't decide to adopt our laws. They have too many weapons to dispose of so the logistics and cost would be absolutely horrendous. They also have such long borders that trying to keep them out would be futile - we're a small island and quite lucky in that respect. The best that could happen is that their existing gun laws get tightened up so that idiots can't get them.Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Busty posted just that a moment ago so yeah, I agree.
We're better tho :snooty:
Oh yeah, there is that constitutional thing too. They feel it's kinda important.
Plus any administration that revoked the right to bear arms wouldn't get voted in again, so it would be a political disaster.
Also the NRA would organise a revolution :(
nm, i might read it later. at the moment i can only handle thing in small portions, like expresso