Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:
Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship.
C'mon, you can do better than that.
People can be in a loving, consensual relationship without anal sex.
:dabs:
it's not really anyones business but the participants rly :unsure:
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
but aren't there plenty of other areas around that area? It all seems a little too convenient for me. :shifty:
Oh well, maybe I'm wrong. All I know is love is a beautiful thing and I support anyone who is in a loving, consensual relationship.
C'mon, you can do better than that.
People can be in a loving, consensual relationship without anal sex.
Well I may have no first hand experience of sex but wouldn't hand-jobs and blow-jobs just not be enough after a while?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
Okay. :mellow:
I still support love.
As do I.
I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.
That's the scientific position. Fact.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
What's the prostate glad for?
Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
Okay. :mellow:
I still support love.
As do I.
I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.
That's the scientific position. Fact.
Is oral sex wrong as well?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
What's the prostate glad for?
Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
[
Well I may have no first hand experience of sex but wouldn't hand-jobs and blow-jobs just not be enough after a while?
No, they are just the icing on the c.....never mind. :rolleyes:
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpatulaGeekGirl
Okay. :mellow:
I still support love.
As do I.
I just don't see that as an argument for a man to bugger another man. The arse is for removing solid waste products. The cawk is for removing liquid waste products or for making babies.
That's the scientific position. Fact.
So? People aren't meant to dye their hair, pierce their ears, put ink under their skin, eat pure sugar, get vaccines and get married. These things aren't "natural" but people do them and they don't harm anyone but the person doing them.
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Re: Homosexual Intercourse - is it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Certainly not for lack of a properly placed letter "n"....:huh:
You can fuck right off, you pedantic, anally retentive, narrow minded prick.
What are you trying to say?
