I agree it's about time the US had a gay new yorker for president :01:
Printable View
@deathking
I saw your what.cd video and laughed alot. I really liked it but look kid you need to look in the mirror. Your in no position to be calling anyone a retard besides this is their debate there is no need for you to be jumping in with your insults.
very well said
I am not a staff member either, consider me, a very well informed and trusted member of communities.
The community rep's name does not break the rules of the tracker:
Never mention our url outside of iTS. You may refer to "iTS" instead.
Therefore I dont know what you are referring to there. The fact is, account traders are not welcome at this tracker. Anyone who is known as an account trader and is invited, WILL be banned. The inviter does also risk getting a ban as well since invites are request only, so you need to know who you are inviting before asking for invites.
I am well within the rights of a user to inform other users here on FST whether or not a candidate would be accepted properly into a community, so they are aware that they might receive a ban for their actions of inviting know Cheaters, scammers, account traders to the site. My posts are targetted at them and only them.
If someone trades accounts and is asking for an invite, there is a highly probable chance that they will just trade the account once it is created, therefore is it not safe to say that giving an invite to someone who trades accounts is the same as trading an account to begin with?
Here is my question to you, if trading accounts is against the rules, how is trading invites not. As an invite is just a new account...is it not?
If you can prove to me that an invite is not a new account, I will gladly concede to your reason, however I believe that when it comes down to it, an account and an invite are the same.
The only difference in account trading is that the person who originally invited the user was unaware that the account would be traded to a new person.
For this tracker, the tracker grants invites per request to users who wish to invite friends. Therefore by trading the invite, the staff who granted you the invite, were unaware that it was to be traded to a random person, not your friend.
Are they not one in the same?
If you dont disagree, then it would seem that FST's rules here saying no account trading for iTS should also apply to invite trading.
I enjoy this debate, it is very intellectually stimulating and more amusing then the normal threads here.
Riddle me this:
http://www.geocities.com/torontodrea...os/riddler.jpg
Good point, well made. :smilie4:
Yes, good words fatcat ! You have mad a important point
We arent saying that, we are saying we arent accepting active traders.
There is a difference between past traders and active traders.
Active = within the last few months
http://files.myopera.com/Eddie_Lopez...e_You_Know.jpg
1. the video was made to be funny. why dont you post a picture of yourself? why the fuck are you insulting how someone else looks, especially online. that is just straightout rude, uncalled for, and is discrimination.
2. fatcat has gone around being a dick for a while and i wanted him to know i dont like him, and that dude that's arguing agianst him is awesome.
3. dont bother responding, because this is the last look i have at this thread.
Yes fatcat i now..I'm a member in some hight level and not gonna mention..And i trade once in a will some thing and low trackers..Yes Its don't invite traders but he doesn't mean i will trade the account..Like to say a non trader will trade is account some day