Cheerleaders at invite section

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spark

I used to report them till the staff asked me to stop it!

---

yea i remember when Detale said that u have reported many spamm and u have doing the same thing so that i why Detale said that to u:P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Forumas

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spark

I used to report them till the staff asked me to stop it!

---

yea i remember when Detale said that u have reported many spamm and u have doing the same thing so that i why Detale said that to u:P

---

Your memory is not bad since you remember the post even when Detale was not the poster! So I think you remember when I told you that you're brainless? right?

Well I'm saying it again just to refresh your memory..

It was not Detale Mr. Brainless it was J.A and the whole thing is none of your business!

I never discussed this thing in public and I will not discuss it!

I think that would be a great idea if FST Admins give us the option to judge on credibility of new threads or even users and their statements by putting up a "thumbs up or thumbs down" system and when a user get an excessive amount of "thumbs down" Admins can go ahead and take some action to stop that user!!? what do you people think about this? of course this might trigger some sort of abuses as well!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spark

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Forumas

yea i remember when Detale said that u have reported many spamm and u have doing the same thing so that i why Detale said that to u:P

---

Your memory is not bad since you remember the post even when Detale was not the poster! So I think you remember when I told you that you're brainless? right?

Well I'm saying it again just to refresh your memory..

It was not Detale Mr. Brainless it was J.A and the whole thing is none of your business!

I never discussed this thing in public and I will not discuss it!

---

ok..my mistake if it wasnt Detale but it was someone from staff anyway,

and sorry if i hurt your feelings :lol:

but also im not suprise why they tell u to stop ;)

Brainless?? lol..nice:w00t:

good luck

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kayvanblue

I think that would be a great idea if FST Admins give us the option to judge on credibility of new threads or even users and their statements by putting up a "thumbs up or thumbs down" system and when a user get an excessive amount of "thumbs down" Admins can go ahead and take some action to stop that user!!? what do you people think about this? of course this might trigger some sort of abuses as well!!

---

this isn't yahoo answers m8 :P

everyone has right to their opinion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by puckface

good luck

---

:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Forumas

ok..my mistake if it wasnt Detale but it was someone from staff anyway,

---

No! He was not a staff member...

Moderating every "good luck", "great giveaway", "I hope you get it", "+1", etc post is like police pulling over every vehicle that has dark window tints. Simply put, our manpower can better be spent on less trivial matters.

From now on, we only urge members to report those who are chronic spammers who infect this forum like a malignant tumor. If we judge that a member is just that, we can easily delete all his spam posts with a few clicks of the mouse and we have done just that on a few occasions. This is better than a report for every spam post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kayvanblue

I think that would be a great idea if FST Admins give us the option to judge on credibility of new threads or even users and their statements by putting up a "thumbs up or thumbs down" system and when a user get an excessive amount of "thumbs down" Admins can go ahead and take some action to stop that user!!? what do you people think about this? of course this might trigger some sort of abuses as well!!

---

Squrrel, I dont know why you think this is "Yahoo answers" material, as this is done on hundreds of other sites that get major amounts of spam.

I think this would not only seriously cut down on the spam that is posted, but allow people to more easily filter through the absolutely ridiculous posts people make. When I want to see how people respond to my thread, I don't want to have a hundred people beforehand spamming my thread. I think this is a good idea, although it would probably take a lot of time before it becomes implemented. Good work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DefX

Moderating every "good luck", "great giveaway", "I hope you get it", "+1", etc post is like police pulling over every vehicle that has dark window tints. Simply put, our manpower can better be spent on less trivial matters.

From now on, we only urge members to report those who are chronic spammers who infect this forum like a malignant tumor. If we judge that a member is just that, we can easily delete all his spam posts with a few clicks of the mouse and we have done just that on a few occasions. This is better than a report for every spam post.

---

word :)