Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ghostbusters
stupid question...
y the hell do you feel the need to answer you suck:angry:
there is only one thing that make a real difference that is the speed of the tracker not the name or the invite system. the best example is TL. a brilliant tracker and you can the invte for that one in a few days. with some hard work.
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
BCG is an archive site, and no we will not have freeleech.
Or at least not freeleech as everyone knows it anyway.
I wont say what it is because it may not ever happen, and we already have the SP system, which is like freeleech, but not freeleech at all lol
Its up to the trackers themselves how they do this, 0-day sites might have and archive section, but sites like BCG and KG are an archive site anyway.
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
I think big, non-scene packs (or compiled of previous scene releases) are really good on trackers, and it differentiates them from one another (unless a tracker is stealing such packs -_-). I think it would be good on gaming trackers as well.
For example, a MAME set (arcade emulator) would be particularly big and awesome, and if that particular torrent doesn't add to your download total, then it would make it even more awesome.
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Why should other trackers want to follow what other sites are doing, scc has there own idea's to run there tracker and do a great job and it is what there users like :)
Another site might have users that would hardly use an archive section and the old stuff they want does not need its own section :)
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Yes its a great way of keeping torrents alive and also its good for your ratio :D
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoi
BCG is an archive site, and no we will not have freeleech.
Or at least not freeleech as everyone knows it anyway.
I wont say what it is because it may not ever happen, and we already have the SP system, which is like freeleech, but not freeleech at all lol
Its up to the trackers themselves how they do this, 0-day sites might have and archive section, but sites like BCG and KG are an archive site anyway.
i like the sp system:naughty:
and i also would say that some of us like the old stuff. and it also give a chance for new users to help themselves:happy:
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LuckIEE
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ghostbusters
stupid question...
y the hell do you feel the need to answer you suck:angry:
there is only one thing that make a real difference that is the speed of the tracker not the name or the invite system. the best example is TL. a brilliant tracker and you can the invte for that one in a few days. with some hard work.
Ghostbusters is the worst spammer I've seen in the Forum lol. I would like an archive section in every tracker but that's a decision of every tracker staff as well.
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
No, absolutely not.
Every tracker must have its own idiosyncrasy. Lately I´m noticing that in the pursuit of being different almost everybody looks like wearing an uniform. :dry:
Re: Should all trackers have the Archive section
Only if they've got the bandwidth to keep the torrents seeded. Most trackers don't so when a torrent is dead it's dead.