Seedbox VS RS Acc

seedbox/ftp. :D

2.5GB/day is not heavy downloader this is super light downloader
and some rs links are deleted so fast that the retention is even worst than newsgroups.

RS but box is really good too

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Funkin'

Right. That definitely is a downfall of RS right now. I was lucky enough to get a couple accounts that still have the 10GB a day download limit. But still, the limit for heavy downloaders definitely will suck...

But, you have to think that with Astraweb(or even Giganews), eventhough it's unlimited downloads you still get a retention. With RS you don't. I've been downloading files anywhere from a year to two old from RS forums. So both methods have their pro's and con's. I think a combination of both is the best way to download(Usenet for all the big files, RS for all the old files).

---

Yeah i got 1 lucky account too :P it expires tomorrow so i am downloading this shit out of warezbb

warezbb, lol i know there :)

What a strange poll, it's not the same price, not the same use ! RS vs Usenet would have more sense

Seedbox FTW!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Detale

For loads cheaper than both you can get usenet access and not have to upload anything or deal with anyone ;)

There's an astraweb banner up top for $11 a month cant beat that using a seedbox or rapidshare acct

---

This is what I would recommend. RS has daily limits, torrents have limited speeds and ratio requirements, usenet is the best for straight up leeching.

If you'd rather spend more a month for a seedbox (for what, the community? lol), you're just silly.

both are good
But i prefer torrent and seedbox