Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qlix
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NippleCake
Not sure if you are there....but check the amount of seeders/leechers on the torrents. Then check ftn.
I'm there, I was one of the first people to staff that site. And most things does not get snatched over at PTN. Speeds also suffer since everyone can upload.
Most things... ..right, the first 8 torrents on the brosw page have at least one snatch. Packs get snatches in double figures, loads of torrents get plenty of snatches. Just because you were staff there at the very start doesnt make a difference to me, in fact you didnt last very long, (i wont ask why? :dabs:) so i tihnk things may be quite different now :happy:
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Demonoid isn't even a good site.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NippleCake
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qlix
I'm there, I was one of the first people to staff that site. And most things does not get snatched over at PTN. Speeds also suffer since everyone can upload.
Most things... ..right, the first 8 torrents on the brosw page have at least one snatch. Packs get snatches in double figures, loads of torrents get plenty of snatches. Just because you were staff there at the very start doesnt make a difference to me, in fact you didnt last very long, (i wont ask why? :dabs:) so i tihnk things may be quite different now :happy:
Because half the Staff were traders, I resigned. And the retention isn't very good there either.
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sake
Why not counts? I have ratio there. Everything is fine.
yeah, i take care of my ratio as well but the reality is that you can't get banned from Demonoid because of a low ratio.
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cinephilia
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qlix
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bone.W.Machine
I know a tracker that has been ratio free for years. (it was even ratio free when it started I think?)
And it is a successful one, so FTN isn't the only one. :smilie4:
Which one would that be?
Demonoid (?)
that's not really a "ratio free tracker" but the ratio doesn't really counts on this tracker.
No, it's not Demonoid.
It's a tracker that specializes itself on motorsport. :artist:
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cinephilia
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sake
Why not counts? I have ratio there. Everything is fine.
yeah, i take care of my ratio as well but the reality is that you can't get banned from Demonoid because of a low ratio.
Oh ... ok :) I thought something else. So .. everybody is doing whatever he wants. I want to have a good ratio, so ... :) Leechers should be happy :D
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sake
Oh ... ok :) I thought something else. So .. everybody is doing whatever he wants. I want to have a good ratio, so ... :) Leechers should be happy :D
same here. unfortunately, many people don't share this way of thinking.
for example, i've uploaded a torrent 1 month ago: 50+ snatchers and i'm the only seeder atm... :ermm:
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cinephilia
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sake
Oh ... ok :) I thought something else. So .. everybody is doing whatever he wants. I want to have a good ratio, so ... :) Leechers should be happy :D
same here. unfortunately, many people don't share this way of thinking.
for example, i've uploaded a torrent 1 month ago: 50+ snatchers and i'm the only seeder atm... :ermm:
Well known :)
This is the right way of thinking, so ... i am feeling comfortable :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qlix
Duck tape.
:blink:
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qlix
Duck tape.
Yes, please use it to shut your mouth before you end up sticking your whole leg into it AGAIN, Eric!... :shutup:
Re: is ratio-less the future?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jasperr
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qlix
Duck tape.
Yes, please use it to shut your mouth before you end up sticking your whole leg into it AGAIN, Eric!... :shutup:
Be quiet, trader. :frusty:
