Myers-Briggs personality test

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squeams

Manky - you and I are supposed to be sworn enemies

---

That can't be true, look:

Attachment 102446

I'm an INTJ.

famous people who are intj include: Isaac Newton, Niels Bohr, C. G. Jung, Michel de Montaigne, Michel Nostradamus, Ada Lovelace.

Well at least it wasn't Linda Lovelace. :yikes:

The first part of the definition form typelogic.com was quite funny:
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age.

Me, arrogant? :blink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squeamous

Bo, we're personality type buddies! I'm an ISTJ too. Or rather 'a bitch' when it's a female. We're horrible :(

---

Speak for yourself, ballbag, I'm as nice as a nice thing.

Actually speaking of arrogant, where are Darthy & MJ when you need them. :idunno:

I answered honestly and got this:

Attachment 102489

I'm not sure if I should be arrogantly proud or not. It says I could be a corporate lawyer or librarian, both sound like horrible careers to me. Then again, the Keirsey description of the architect seems to be quite flattering

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rational Portrait of the Architect (INTP)

Ruthless pragmatists about ideas, and insatiably curious, Architects are driven to find the most efficient means to their ends, and they will learn in any manner and degree they can. They will listen to amateurs if their ideas are useful, and will ignore the experts if theirs are not. Authority derived from office, credential, or celebrity does not impress them. Architects are interested only in what make sense, and thus only statements that are consistent and coherent carry any weight with them.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

What is the 'diagnosis' for the 20% of the population who point blank refuse to take tests because taking tests to them is an adherence to shite?

---

They're called 'irritating'. They're the sorts of people who like to think they're special, delicate individual little flowers who regularly say and do things that have never been said or done in the history of the world ever. They're quite wrong though, they're just as mundane as everyone and everything else.

Taking a test like this isn't adhering to anything, it will probably just tell you what you deep down already know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

That can't be true, look:

Attachment 102446

---

:lol:

Look, this isn't astrology you muppet. It's based on the answers you give. You're just rejecting it because you're a shallow, vacuous ENFP with no need for deeper understandings :console:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squeamous

Taking a test like this isn't adhering to anything, it will probably just tell you what you deep down already know.

---

In this case, serves as much of a point as an astrology reading doesn't it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

I'm not sure if I should be arrogantly proud or not. It says I could be a corporate lawyer or librarian, both sound like horrible careers to me. Then again, the Keirsey description of the architect seems to be quite flattering

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rational Portrait of the Architect (INTP)

Ruthless pragmatists about ideas, and insatiably curious, Architects are driven to find the most efficient means to their ends, and they will learn in any manner and degree they can. They will listen to amateurs if their ideas are useful, and will ignore the experts if theirs are not. Authority derived from office, credential, or celebrity does not impress them. Architects are interested only in what make sense, and thus only statements that are consistent and coherent carry any weight with them.

---

---

Does sound like you. You're not exactly the mindless follower type are you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

In this case, serves as much of a point as an astrology reading doesn't it?

---

The outcome is similar. It's the purpose and method that's different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squeamous

Does sound like you. You're not exactly the mindless follower type are you?

---

You're exactly right, I am not the mindless follower type.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squeamous

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

In this case, serves as much of a point as an astrology reading doesn't it?

---

The outcome is similar. It's the purpose and method that's different.

---

When I said point, I meant it to include both outcome and purpose with no inclusion of method. Purpose is something that sits with the designer's context, but as far as an internet test goes... well...