Quote:
Originally Posted by
megabyteme
The fact that I would only watch it once makes it a pay-per-view. There is noting there that I would need/want to see a second time regardless of my ability to watch it. You are hung up on your warm fuzzy feelings for the marketing. It may be a bargain for you, but for me it's $5 for a one-time-viewing.
I see the point you're trying to make, and it'd be terribly expensive to pay for every instance of viewing television episodes. But if you consider the way films are, that's essentially what we already do. I find subscription services to work quite well for TV, and I could see these services being both independent and centralized, with the centralized distribution costing a little more. That's how it's processing in my head anyway.