http://www.newsweek.com/roger-ebert-...d-movies-70247
Roger Ebert was a genius so discount what he says at your peril.
Printable View
http://www.newsweek.com/roger-ebert-...d-movies-70247
Roger Ebert was a genius so discount what he says at your peril.
Dredd is not bad.
Must be Avatar.
Transformers :)
Monsters v Aliens is also very good
Life of Pi too - epic adventure and a feast for the eyes!
Excellent topic as watching something in 3D is obviously more important than watching something that is actually good.
That's why back in July 2009 I gave up the opportunity of watching (500) Days of Summer and instead wisely bought a ticket for G-Force 3D.
Avatar is mine :)
How to train your dragon is another good one...
Interesting. Bet it doesn't cause eyestrain, headaches, or make the kids complain...Quote:
MaxiVision48, which uses existing film technology but shoots at 48 frames per second and provides smooth projection that is absolutely jiggle-free. Modern film is projected at 24 frames per second (fps) because that is the lowest speed that would carry analog sound in the first days of the talkies.[...] MaxiVision48 projects at 48fps, which doubles image quality. [...] In terms of standard measurements used in the industry, it’s 400 percent better. That is not a misprint. Those who haven’t seen it have no idea how good it is. I’ve seen it, and also a system of some years ago, Douglas Trumbull’s Showscan. These systems are so good that the screen functions like a window into three dimensions. If moviegoers could see it, they would simply forget about 3-D.
You apparently read and learn things and do other ghey stuff that further drain my respect for you so....
http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-jou...ll-case-closed
Apparently are brains aren't even wired to process the current version of 3D technology properly but oh yeah Transformers Dark of the Moon was SWEEEEEEET!