Need More Space, Please...

I figured it out, you need to Change your username to Gigabyteme. Mega was fine in April of '09, but the times they are a changin.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pootystomp

I figured it out, you need to Change your username to Gigabyteme. Mega was fine in April of '09, but the times they are a changin.

---

640 attachments ought to be enough for anybody.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by piercerseth

640 attachments ought to be enough for anybody.

---

http://i.imgur.com/yxbsQEJ.gif?1

*Note: I had to use IMGUR to host this* :pinch:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by piercerseth

640 attachments ought to be enough for anybody.

---

There is no reason for any individual to have an attachment in their post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by piercerseth

640 attachments ought to be enough for anybody.

---

There is no reason for any individual to have an attachment in their post.

---

I prefer using attachments because 5, 10, 15 years from now you can look back at the thread and the images links are still working.
How many times have you found a thread through google full of images with dead links?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tesco

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anon

There is no reason for any individual to have an attachment in their post.

---

I prefer using attachments because 5, 10, 15 years from now you can look back at the thread and the images links are still working.
How many times have you found a thread through google full of images with dead links?

---

Of course you are absolutely correct for the site, tesco. I believe you are missing both of their historical references, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tesco

I prefer using attachments because 5, 10, 15 years from now you can look back at the thread and the images links are still working.
How many times have you found a thread through google full of images with dead links?

---

Of course you are absolutely correct for the site, tesco. I believe you are missing both of their historical references, though.

---

Ok, ok, ok. We'll double the number of attachments every 18 months. Fair?

How is this possible with a server that has only 1,000 vacuum tubes and only weighs 1 1/2 tons?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tesco

I prefer using attachments because 5, 10, 15 years from now you can look back at the thread and the images links are still working.
How many times have you found a thread through google full of images with dead links?

---

Of course you are absolutely correct for the site, tesco. I believe you are missing both of their historical references, though.

---

:blushing:

Shirley some of those are in the 20 dollar thread prior to 2/18/14. All those posts are in the trash now anyhow. Maybe just delete all you attachments older than a year. It isn't likely anyone is looking at them anyhow
__________________
kiran