Looks like we're going back to the the bad old days.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhNoYouHavent

I did that just after I'd figured out that they're just a bunch of nasty scum who are all gutless, and that as such they posed no immediate risk to myself or my family.

---

Like biilybonehead you can't have it both ways,Dave.

You can't go around talking about concern for your family while in the say breath threatening other people's.There some word for that someplace.

The emails posted initially looked like they could have come from you, Dave, but with the things said (background info from them), those look less and less likely.

I do not see you as the blackmailing type. You have your MO, and we've seen it here for a LONG, LONG time. There are some stylistic similarities, and some descriptive words like 'scum' you use repeatedly, but not the slam-dunk evidence I'd expect to see. You have a recognizable writing voice, and certain core beliefs (looney by most standards, but fairly consistent) in everything we've seen from you.

What was Chavis' take on the "evidence"? He's far better at recognizing who's who than I will ever be.

Honestly, I'd put the chances of this being you around 35-40%. Not entirely enough to dismiss the claims, but I wouldn't sock you in the jaw, either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

I have doubts abut your sanity.

---

Yeah I have them occassionally, then I look at the way some people behave towards others, and I realise I'm perfectly sane. It's right to get angry about gutless scum deliberately hurting people for fun.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

The emails posted initially looked like they could have come from you, Dave, but with the things said (background info from them), those look less and less likely.

I do not see you as the blackmailing type. You have your MO, and we've seen it here for a LONG, LONG time. There are some stylistic similarities, and some descriptive words like 'scum' you use repeatedly, but not the slam-dunk evidence I'd expect to see. You have a recognizable writing voice, and certain core beliefs (looney by most standards, but fairly consistent) in everything we've seen from you.

What was Chavis' take on the "evidence"? He's far better at recognizing who's who than I will ever be.

Honestly, I'd put the chances of this being you around 35-40%. Not entirely enough to dismiss the claims, but I wouldn't sock you in the jaw, either.

---

Well we know Dave far better than you, and it looks like he's probably running one or two other socks on here also. Time will tell when our Dave is escorted into the party van.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

Like biilybonehead you can't have it both ways,Dave.

You can't go around talking about concern for your family while in the say breath threatening other people's.There some word for that someplace.

---

My family aren't online at all, so these fuckwits are hunting for people who have no footprint, and me whos only footprint is here, and only because they came here for me.

The worst they can do to me is go tell my boss that I'm a really nasty bastard, he already knows that :-D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by billybonehead

Don't worry Dave, I've received some infractions.

---

I've got several infractions for being too good looking.Those jealous mod bastards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhNoYouHavent

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

I have doubts abut your sanity.

---

Yeah I have them occassionally, then I look at the way some people behave towards others, and I realise I'm perfectly sane. It's right to get angry about gutless scum deliberately hurting people for fun.

---

Cut them open Dave. Cut them all open. Hey - I noticed that woman's account you posted. Nice to see you targeting the ladies again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by billybonehead

Well we know Dave far better than you, and it looks like he's probably running one or two other socks on here also. Time will tell when our Dave is escorted into the party van.

---

Not to cause you any undue concern but next time you refer to yourself as "we" I'm going to pay a Serbian hitman to hunt you down and kill you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

The emails posted initially looked like they could have come from you, Dave, but with the things said (background info from them), those look less and less likely.

I do not see you as the blackmailing type. You have your MO, and we've seen it here for a LONG, LONG time. There are some stylistic similarities, and some descriptive words like 'scum' you use repeatedly, but not the slam-dunk evidence I'd expect to see. You have a recognizable writing voice, and certain core beliefs (looney by most standards, but fairly consistent) in everything we've seen from you.

What was Chavis' take on the "evidence"? He's far better at recognizing who's who than I will ever be.

Honestly, I'd put the chances of this being you around 35-40%. Not entirely enough to dismiss the claims, but I wouldn't sock you in the jaw, either.

---

MBM, how many accounts have I had here? How many of them did I try to deceive you all into believing I was someone else? Every account I have setup here with the exception of the one I am currently using normally, which has only posted 5 posts. Is clearly my account.

He's telling you that I'm running around here pretending to be other people, on here. You believe that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by billybonehead

Nice to see you targeting the ladies again.

---

You mean like she targetted me on Twitter. She's one of yours, part of *we*, who incorrectly identified and then attacked me. You didn't believe you were the only ones entitled to perosnally attack people did you?