Exactly, where's the clean version that is mentioned in the article.Quote:
Originally posted by J'Pol+7 December 2003 - 16:38--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J'Pol @ 7 December 2003 - 16:38)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by scribblec@7 December 2003 - 17:23
<!--QuoteBegin-J'Pol
Quote:
@7 December 2003 - 16:21
Forgive the obvious question, but if K+ is spyware and adware free, what's the problem with using it.
sharman doesn't like the idea that we are using a program which has no adverts
no adverts means no customers so adverts = money and if everyone is using lite then they get none and become unhappy
they are pulling out all stops to stop this program from actually staying afloat
i will upgrade to 2.6 but wheres the clean version :huh:
Is that from Sharman, if so what's the point. Surely they need the adverts for their business model to work, as you so rightly point out.Quote:
The effects of this extermination is already taking place, as search times and connection times are deteriorating compared to K+ (the legitimate spyware/adware free version of Kazaa.)
I cannot understand why they would produce a spyware/adware free version. There must be something I am missing. [/b][/quote]
THEY WANT MONEY
MONEY DOES NOT GROW ON TREES
adverts equals money
more adverts more money
no adverts no money
capiece?