Surprising Results!

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-13-2003, 06:20 AM
Dray_04

Quote:

Originally posted by raiserblade2003+13 December 2003 - 04:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (raiserblade2003 @ 13 December 2003 - 04:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Triadcool@13 December 2003 - 03:19

Quote:

lol you think what you got w/ the 5200 in 3d2001 is good? my pci mx440 has a score of 4526 and it only have 64mb ram. okay guess i wont be getting a 5200 any more.

Its not all the card thats making the score. What are your computer specs? Mine are 1ghz processor, 856mb pc133 ram, fx 5200 256mb video card, msi ms-6330, 80 gb processor. As you can see my computer specs arent that high.

my current oldie emachine...

1.5ghz celeron
128mb of pc2100
im pretty sure its some generic mobo
40gb (dont think this affect your score)
and the PCI mx440 64mb ddr

P.S. remeber, im running xp w/ 128mb of ram. [/b][/quote]
how did u get a higher score than me in 01. when clearly ure machine (your older machine) isnt as high as my specs.

sori im not trying to brag or nething im just wondering how you got a good score with that card and with those specs :huh:
12-13-2003, 06:21 AM
abu_has_the_power

Quote:

Originally posted by dray_02@13 December 2003 - 01:17
my gfx only got 940 3d marks in 03. :(

my specs are below.

however im confused because i got 4008 3d marks in 01. and ure card is 256mb and mine is 128.

so does it not matter how big the ram is on the card? say if he threw the exact card into my computer would it get a higher score than 4008 marks?

p.s is 4008 3dmarks good?

how much doesn't really matter bench and power wise. it'll only give the user more space to render graphx, but not necessarilly render at a high speed. it'll be the same as a gfx 5200 128, but u can see some improvement. so far, and not for another couple years, games won't be requiring 256mb ram on ur vd card
12-13-2003, 06:26 AM
Dray_04

can sum1 tell me if my MS 6367 mobo is the main source of 'graphic loss'. its 4x agp and all my specs are below.

4008 marks - 01
905 marks - 03
12-13-2003, 07:09 AM
Smith

631 on 3ds mark 2001 :D
12-13-2003, 07:18 AM
raiserblade2003

Quote:

Originally posted by TheCanuk@13 December 2003 - 07:09
631 on 3ds mark 2001 :D

there are 3 possiblities y u are getting such low score,

1: you mean 3dmark03
2: you forgot to type in a number so your score is 6xxx and not 631
3: you have a video card from one of the first computer ever made
12-13-2003, 07:44 AM
Dray_04

Quote:

3: you have a video card from one of the first computer ever made

lmfao :lol:
12-13-2003, 09:10 AM
bob_the_alien

Quote:

Originally posted by raiserblade2003@13 December 2003 - 01:18
3: you have a video card from one of the first computer ever made

I don't think you would be able to get it to work in a new system.
I'd say one of those would most likely be ISA.
(Well, first mass-market video cards) because the first were designed just for the computers they were in, and those computers were all designed differently.

Which I haven't seen a new mobo in a while that still supports ISA, too bad too, I've got quite a few ISA cards lying around, modems, network cards.
And one that everyone is going to laugh about.

An ISA processor card, made to use dual processors on one motherboard, came around before dual-processor mobos were big, supports up to a Pentium (1).

I still have a ATI 3d Rage, too, 2mb ram, pci slot, and includes a upgrade slot on card for installing extra video ram. :lol: I remember playing dos games all the day with that card, still works too.
DAMN, I'm getting old. :lol:
12-13-2003, 07:02 PM
raiserblade2003

Quote:

Originally posted by bob_the_alien+13 December 2003 - 09:10--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bob_the_alien @ 13 December 2003 - 09:10)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-raiserblade2003@13 December 2003 - 01:18
3: you have a video card from one of the first computer ever made

I don't think you would be able to get it to work in a new system.
I'd say one of those would most likely be ISA.
(Well, first mass-market video cards) because the first were designed just for the computers they were in, and those computers were all designed differently.

Which I haven't seen a new mobo in a while that still supports ISA, too bad too, I've got quite a few ISA cards lying around, modems, network cards.
And one that everyone is going to laugh about.

An ISA processor card, made to use dual processors on one motherboard, came around before dual-processor mobos were big, supports up to a Pentium (1).

I still have a ATI 3d Rage, too, 2mb ram, pci slot, and includes a upgrade slot on card for installing extra video ram. :lol: I remember playing dos games all the day with that card, still works too.
DAMN, I'm getting old. :lol: [/b][/quote]
yea......i was being sarcastic..... <_<
12-19-2003, 06:41 AM
bob_the_alien

Quote:

Originally posted by raiserblade2003@13 December 2003 - 13:02
yea......i was being sarcastic..... <_<

;) yeah, I know.......
12-19-2003, 07:07 AM
raiserblade2003

Quote:

Originally posted by bob_the_alien+19 December 2003 - 06:41--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bob_the_alien @ 19 December 2003 - 06:41)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-raiserblade2003@13 December 2003 - 13:02
yea......i was being sarcastic..... <_<

;) yeah, I know....... [/b][/quote]
wow u went diggin for this just to post that? you must need some post count really bad or u are really bored

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page