Quote:
According to the law of the Talmud and the present laws of Israel, Rupert Murdoch is a Jew. His father married Elisabeth Joy Greene who is from a wealthy Jewish family.
You know... I thought that this was very interesting since it's the first time I'd heard that he was Jewish. I decided to look it up and I have to say that the only websites where I found this mentioned was on alternative history websites or severely anti-semitic (yes, anti-semitic) sites. Coincidently, the same little blurb about "according to the Talmud and present laws of Israel" was also used on each of these sites. These sites all spoke of Murdoch being Jewish in the context of a vast Jewish conspiracy in which Murdoch as well as many other Jews knew of 9/11 weeks before it happened, implying that Jews were the purpetrators.
Example:
direct quote from convicted holocaust denier David Irving's site: "And that, as I am sure you know, makes him a Jew according to the law of the Talmud, and indeed according to the present laws of Israel."
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/05/Murdoch2.html
Other sites that repeat the same thing pretty much word for word are "truthseeker" and "the unjust media", two virulently anti-semitic sites.
Now, why your own words are so close to those of David Irving's..... my mind can only wonder.
I now feel no need to respond to the rest of your post since one thing the internet has taught me is not to bother debating with folks who believe crap like this.But whatever, I'm a slow learner.
Quote:
As for those other companies, just because they are "publicly owned" means nothing. Shareholders do not get to make decisions about the political stance an organisation will take. As long as the profits keep flowing in they are happy bunnies.
You need to learn something about public corporations. They do answer to their shareholders. Profits depend on this. If you don't believe me, go read an economics book. The least you can do is admit that you were wrong about these companies being owned by Jews.
Quote:
Is it anti-semitic to point out that huge swathes of the media are owned by Jew's and thus put forward a pro-Israel stance?
It is anti-semitic if it's not true.
Quote:
Now.. this huge rise in anti-semitism in the UK.. who am I to say anything? I only live 10 miles from the biggest Jewish centre in the UK so what do I know!
So, because you live 10 miles (that ain't so close, my friend!!) from a Jewish community centre, you feel that you know of the plight of anti-semitism in the UK better than an EU commission's detailed study. P'shaw! :D
Quote:
Now.. the reason you are not seeing "exhibits displaying the beauty of Chechen suicide bombers? Iraqi suicide bombers? 9/11 suicide bombers?" etc is because they are TERRORISTS not civilized governments.
You've confused yourself here. This doesn't make sense. Are you saying that Palestinian suicide bombers killing children at cafes and night clubs and restaurants are not terrorists, like Chechen suicide bombers or Iraqi suicide bombers that are trying to drive out the US occupation forces?
Quote:
The fact is that in Europe we have a far more balanced view of the middle east situation compared to the USA, and because we are not fanatically pro-Israel...
How sinple life must be to know that you are so even-minded and balanced whereas those other people are so blinded by money and media influence. Now, pray tell, how do you know that it's not YOU who is blinded by the BBC and The Guardian (owned by a massively rich and far Left Scott Trust, which owns The Observer among a couple dozen other major newspapers & magazines) who are biased in their own right? With so many more Muslims that Jews in the UK and the rest of Europe, how do you know that you're not getting pro-Palestinian info because that's who the media plays to?
Jeez, how easy it must be to know that you are of such a free mind while everyone else is biased and blinded.