Maximum Pc

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-12-2004, 04:30 AM
j4y3m

Quote:

Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+12 March 2004 - 03:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 12 March 2004 - 03:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@11 March 2004 - 23:24
<!--QuoteBegin-stupidguy

Quote:

@11 March 2004 - 22:23
I've been lookin at some reviews with benchmarks etc and it seems the Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor with HT Technology Extreme Edition(3.4GHz easily overclockable to 3.8) is the fastest processor in the world so umm... Yep. :blink:

It is :)

But cost like 800 bux...i dont realy count that as a mainstream pc cpu haha

true i agree...how much could an fx-51 overclock? since its around the price of a p4 3.2ghz then if it was more overclockable it would be the best processor. [/b][/quote]
Not much, I think tomshardware tried to oc it abit but didn't get very high.
03-12-2004, 04:38 AM
Triadcool

Quote:

group  everybody

Lets have a big group hug. :D
03-12-2004, 04:45 AM
j4y3m

:ermm: Okay. :unsure:
03-12-2004, 04:50 AM
_John_Lennon_

You know, if I had like 7k to spend on a kick ass computer, I still wouldnt get the P4EE's.

I would get one Fx-51 probably, and then several 64 bit machines.
03-12-2004, 04:51 AM
j4y3m

Quote:

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:50
You know, if I had like 7k to spend on a kick ass computer, I still wouldnt get the P4EE's.

I would get one Fx-51 probably, and then several 64 bit machines.

Reason? :blink:
03-12-2004, 04:54 AM
tesco

Quote:

Originally posted by stupidguy+11 March 2004 - 23:51--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (stupidguy @ 11 March 2004 - 23:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:50
You know, if I had like 7k to spend on a kick ass computer, I still wouldnt get the P4EE's.

I would get one Fx-51 probably, and then several 64 bit machines.

Reason? :blink: [/b][/quote]
intels a peice lol... no j/k, amd's are 64bit so they're uhh...better...will have support of future 64bit stuff...
03-12-2004, 04:54 AM
_John_Lennon_

because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB's of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB's tops.

Except a good several hundred dollars.

Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

Wouldnt you?
03-12-2004, 05:06 AM
j4y3m

Quote:

Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:54
because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB's of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB's tops.

Except a good several hundred dollars.

Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

Wouldnt you?

If I had that much money... No. I'd want the highest priced of everything I could find. :lol:
03-12-2004, 05:09 AM
tesco

Quote:

Originally posted by stupidguy+12 March 2004 - 00:06--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (stupidguy @ 12 March 2004 - 00:06)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:54
because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB's of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB's tops.

Except a good several hundred dollars.

Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

Wouldnt you?

If I had that much money... No. I'd want the highest priced of everything I could find. :lol: [/b][/quote]
and that is why u dont have much money...you waste what you do have and it never gets saved up...
03-12-2004, 05:11 AM
j4y3m

Quote:

Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+12 March 2004 - 04:09--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 12 March 2004 - 04:09)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

Originally posted by stupidguy@12 March 2004 - 00:06
<!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_

Quote:

@12 March 2004 - 03:54
because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB's of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB's tops.

Except a good several hundred dollars.

Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

Wouldnt you?

If I had that much money... No. I'd want the highest priced of everything I could find. :lol:

and that is why u dont have much money...you waste what you do have and it never gets saved up... [/b][/quote]
Waste it on what?

Note: the " :lol: " smily implies that I am joking or laughig because I know what I have said is stupid.
:P

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page